Murray Fish

1.03 and firming. It's interesting to see how things are going back a century, re Ownership! Again becoming the domain of 'vanity projects' for wealthy cashed up members of the bourgeoisie! Mostly framed around 'breeding' tax breaks etc! Winnie has delivered well there!

and even less staff for riding track work! hence Harness is a bigger game in the deep south!

you have me down to a t..... and it can be rather frustrating attempting to base any bet 'on looks/presentation' etc when the pictures presented don't allow you to actually see all the horses in a race!

Sadly you have summed it 'the politics' well! Interestingly! I bet! 1.05 all the key players for say last 25 years have been right wingers. The sensible ones understand what it means re Sunset Industry! (hence! the lack of effort historically from the Nats) others! are happy to pick up 'a dead cat', and can be heard (after throwing it down on the ground) "Did you see in bounce!!!" "There's still more life in it!"

where on the list should it be? ? ps, are you as bellicose in person as you present on here!!!

great picture coming through... lol! no sound though...

again!

I can't help but to throw in a Sneer!!!!! directed at the committee of this club! Would there be a more myopic club in the county!!! Note the crowd! or lack of it! You have reaped what you have sowed!

a small technical thing: if you want to break anyone's post into smaller bits, what you need to do is to go to the start of where you want to quote, Highlight the text you to quote, that will then give you the option to click 'quote this'...

i love punting into the small fields... so much easier... ?

Origin of the phrase[edit] The complete paragraph containing Marx's statement of the creed in the Critique of the Gotha Program is as follows:

I think around 1910 the D cup and the Auckland cup were both worth around the same prize money and both cities had the same population...

lol very little about 'horse sales' do make sense!

CWJ's winning $alute was the highlight for me!!!! $$$$

he was gelded way back last century.... now sits next to those 3 monkeys!!!

any idea who gets the ride over the ditch?

lol! hence my rather aggressive talking down John Allan at a public meeting when he said there was a real need to educate the average/new punter about betting.!!! ?

lol! it's because of igits that believe that sort of bollocks that the State now says No to violence to children!!! ps. talking about society's ills, perhaps it's time for you to brush up on the exploitative nature of modern capitalism in nz! that's where the majority of current problems can be traced to!

others would be saying "easy to spot the idiots!" ps. proud to say I have never spent 1 cent on them... lol! happy to donate about fifty bucks a year to local school raffles.. amusingly, after 18 years, still to win one prize!!!

Who the Ombudsmen can investigate What kinds of organisations can the Ombudsmen investigate? Ombudsmen Act 1975, s 13, Schedule 1 The Ombudsmen can investigate the conduct and decisions of any of the following agencies: government departments and ministries such as the Ministry of Education and the Inland Revenue Department – and specific units and services within them, like Work and Income (which is part of the Ministry of Social Development) Crown entities (government-owned organisations) – for example, the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), Housing New Zealand, the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA), and the Commerce Commission boards appointed under specific Acts – for example, the Charities Registration Board, the Arts Board and the New Zealand Geographic Board state-owned enterprises – for example, New Zealand Post and Transpower New Zealand committees of local government bodies such as city councils, district councils, regional councils and harbour boards (only the committees, not the local bodies themselves) public health authorities – for example, district health boards education authorities – for example, school boards of trustees and universities. Who can’t the Ombudsmen investigate? Ombudsmen Act 1975, s 13 The Ombudsmen can’t investigate complaints about: private individuals, and private organisations like companies and incorporated societies lawyers MPs and government Ministers (however, the Ombudsmen can investigate complaints about advice provided to Ministers by government agencies and decisions made by Ministers about requests for official information) police conduct – these complaints are dealt with by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (see the chapter “Police powers”) decisions made by a local council (but the Ombudsmen can investigate decisions made by a council’s committees, including a recommendation from a committee to the council that then results in a decision of the council – so this can be an indirect way of challenging a council’s decision.) decisions made by courts, tribunals and parole boards.

"Marxist-type bureaucratic regulatory conditions " lol!!! this reminds me of when Marx once said "I am not a marxist" referring to the ravings of a person throwing around cheap jargon like De Lore. Gee! I wonder how much spittle there is all over his computer! ? For what is worth! If one Was to actually attempt to apply a marxist approach! then one would start at the point of Production! Note how the cost of Service fees and the costs of getting a horse to the races is never out front in any discussion! Reflecting whom has Hegemony over Racing Industry. ps. i hold one of the bigger Marxist private Libraries in NZ!!!

except himself....

.

you do know who actually brought in the Minister of R in the first place??? when you look in the mirror, what sort of igit do you see looking back!

lol! technology was the winner in d town... unlimited fast as fibre and landline at $80 a month = Brilliant! ??