Yes, well-meaning no doubt, but misinformed. But what will our industries do to combat this mindset?
Putting out fluffy media reports on the NZTR website will do nothing, and, sadly, even though Marty Burns [ NZTR animal welfare officer] is a decent and approachable bloke, he can't single-handedly produce stables and properties across the country to re-school and re-home retired racehorses. Set ups like that require both funding and effort, both of which seem to be lacking.
Compare our operations with V'Landy's immediate response to the sensationalist TV doco. about the horse abbatoir.
Even the much maligned greyhound code has kennels dedicated to rehoming retired dogs. I have one myself from such a setup, and the girls involved do a great job checking out the dog's potential home, and following up the progress.
I don't think harness is organised, but there are well -intentioned people who do try to rehome as well.
No such system with T.B's although there are people in the Waikato who handle Hong Kong returnees. [ Gina Schick ?]
Despite all the grand talk emanating, I have never been contacted by anyone from NZTR about any horse removed from my stable return list.
That needs to be addressed and smartly, if public perception is to be altered in any way.
And, although I am a lover of the jumper, the sight of an exhausted horse floundering over the last fence is not one I like. One way, possibly, would be to remove the last fence where that fence is close to the finish. Allow a decent run-in so that horses battle out the finish on the flat. Less chance for injury and much less horrifying for the general public.