Good comments.
You will have noticed that the top of the turf was chipping out, does it most always, but it would have been very hard underneath. The type of soil underlying just can't absorb irrigation very well and can produce very shifty, false footing ; hence Pitty's intense dislike of artificially watered tracks.
Once it rains properly, the conditions change markedly and we can get very testing ground indeed.
I'm sure some of my owners scratch their heads at my choice not to run there very often, in summer certainly. But I know that, despite watering, the jar is significant.
A few years ago I had a modest little performer with a pedal bone problem. Very genuine, he was, but struggled on anything but softish footing. I took him to Riverton on one occasion, thinking that the track would suit him perfectly.
For once, it didn't rain. When normally, at Riverton at Easter, stable people and spectators alike are clad in swannies, parkas and gumboots, the public came out in their summer finery. Local girls sported short skirts and fascinators....!
The track came out as Gd 2. If the costs to get to the bottom of the island hadn't been so significant, I would have pulled him out, but decided to allow him to run. Worried myself sick for hours - but he bounced off the peaty turf and won.
Later, back home, I ran him at Riccarton on a Dead 5.....and he felt the ground badly and didn't let down.
Agree re. Strathayr. That [ IMO ] is the only way to get some credibility, consistency, and a horse-friendly surface.
And, given the difficulty in getting sufficient water to all the grass areas, how on earth is an allweather going to be well maintained - as well as the existing grass course? correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a fair bit of water is required in the upkeep of one.