Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

All the Best Awapuni!


jess

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, curious said:

Why are they suddenly doing all this renovation of the AWTs since they got the Massey report 5 weeks ago and why has that not been released to stake holders?

I didn't say they were doing the scheduled major maintenance, just that it is due.  I'd say they are waiting for funds from land grabs before being able to commence.  Now that Trentham has provided a refurbished bar and birdcage fencing at Awapuni, it's time to find the next donor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Special Agent said:

I don't know what you mean about closed tracks.

The meeting moved from Woodville to Hawera to Waverley.  The latter two were slated to close in the Messara report.  Waverley had their own meeting to worry about but, had to accommodate the industry.

What I'm saying is what meetings at Waverley occurred because NZTR had closed a track?  Waverley had to accommodate Hawera and Woodville because although they were open tracks they weren't up to standard.

The fact is there are 70 less race meetings since 2006 to run on Turf tracks throughout New Zealand.  Which tracks get those remaining?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

I agree with the majority of your post - it is well thought out and reasoned.  It's just this quote I don't agree with.

Are tracks really "being hammered"?

In 2006-07 Season:

Screenshot 2025-04-27 131552.png

 

In the 2023-24 Seaon:

There were 292 meetings - 7 less than 2006-07 BUT

404 less races which is the equivalent of 40 less race meetings.

Are tracks really getting "getting hammered"?

So, of the 51 racetracks used in 2006,  how many are still in use now?

Again, I can only refer to local conditions not NZ wide, but in Canterbury/Marlborough alone,  there are races formerly held at Riccarton, Motukarara, Rangiora,  Ashburton, Timaru, Geraldine, Waimate and Blenheim; now nearly all being held at Riccarton and Ashburton - with a nod to Timaru.

Ashburton has to hold trials too, whereas earlier, Rangiora, Motukarara and Geraldine chipped in and did their bit.

So I think it is fair to say yes, tracks are getting hammered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

I thought wet sand was more compact than dry sand?  Don't you train horses on the beach @curious?

 

For a start that puts to bed the myths flying around that there was NO water applied.  So 23mm of water leading up to the raceday wasn't enough?  When evaporation rates were low?  Has Awapuni got a pond or is there a natural spring near by?  The water rates bill might become expensive.

 

That was going to be my next query.    Ellerslie has a lake in the middle.      How is Awapuni going to maintain/manage the amount of water seemingly needed for this sandpit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Freda said:

That was going to be my next query.    Ellerslie has a lake in the middle.      How is Awapuni going to maintain/manage the amount of water seemingly needed for this sandpit?

They have to buy it. The question is, what with?

Or, do they have an irrigation bore?

Edited by curious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

What I'm saying is what meetings at Waverley occurred because NZTR had closed a track?  Waverley had to accommodate Hawera and Woodville because although they were open tracks they weren't up to standard.

 

That's the point it is their job to identify these problems/issues well ahead of the prospect of abandonment and moving meetings is even considered. They haven't and they won't. That's been born out by their persistence and ignorance around closing venues. 

The biggest issue with NZTR is they have absolutely no idea how the industry works , clueless and I mean clueless about how it functions. It would function better and has done so in the past without them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, curious said:

They have to buy it. The question is, what with?

I told you with what.  Now Trentham is a shadow of it's former self the next lot of land grabs begin to maintain Awapuni.

Trainers told them they would not be able to afford the upkeep of the synthetic.  Now there is another costly burden until the course proper is up and running again.

Maybe the birdcage can be opened for picnics.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

What I'm saying is what meetings at Waverley occurred because NZTR had closed a track?  Waverley had to accommodate Hawera and Woodville because although they were open tracks they weren't up to standard.

The fact is there are 70 less race meetings since 2006 to run on Turf tracks throughout New Zealand.  Which tracks get those remaining?

Don't you think Awapuni and Hastings out of commission impacted on the remaining CD tracks?  Maybe not permanently closed yet but, neither were operational at the time.  Trentham was also under the earthquake prone cloud.  Otaki was out for repair.  Wanganui had had the running rail issue, in addition to taking on races from other venues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Special Agent said:

Don't you think Awapuni and Hastings out of commission impacted on the remaining CD tracks? 

Of course it did.  But how many race meetings did it actually affect?  There have been fewer race meetings to host so not as many as some people assume.

The majority of the HB Guineas meeting went North to the Waikato.

Trentham got off lightly with only two or three extra meetings.  Hardly a hammering.

Waverley has taken up the slack.  New Plymouth did SFA.

But Waverley is like Ashburton why didn't they push back?  Did both Clubs do a deal that secures track renovatipn funding and a license to race in the future?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

 

But Waverley is like Ashburton why didn't they push back?  Did both Clubs do a deal that secures track renovatipn funding and a license to race in the future?

Ashburton did push back.    Refused to hold the latest set of grass trials because the track wasn't up to it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Huey said:

That's the point it is their job to identify these problems/issues well ahead of the prospect of abandonment and moving meetings is even considered. They haven't and they won't. That's been born out by their persistence and ignorance around closing venues. 

The biggest issue with NZTR is they have absolutely no idea how the industry works , clueless and I mean clueless about how it functions. It would function better and has done so in the past without them.

Probably worth remembering that NZTR have only had to run things for the last 20 years or so. Previously they had very little to do with closing down tracks, funding stakes, deciding on dates, building grandstands, renovating tracks. etc.

So this is all relatively new to them and they aren't really up to it. Ironically at a time when most clubs have lost all of their enthusiasm and can't put up much of a fight. They would have struggled to push through many of these "innovations" 30 years ago.

  • Like 1
  • Champ Post 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, if we put the justifiable emotional outbursts to one side we get to the crux of the matter

5 minutes ago, Doomed said:

Probably worth remembering that NZTR have only had to run things for the last 20 years or so. Previously they had very little to do with closing down tracks, funding stakes, deciding on dates, building grandstands, renovating tracks. etc.

So this is all relatively new to them and they aren't really up to it

The only part of your statement Doomed I would change is to put the words re NZTR "They aren't really up to it"  in BOLD

The Industry has been run with a corporate model for the last 20 years but with no shareholder accountability. We are at a crossroads, the people who are in charge but are not in charge, as they really do not know what to do, have been there far too long. The only way this can change for the better, is for the Racing Minister to wield and use the metaphorical axe

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

Of course it did.  But how many race meetings did it actually affect?  There have been fewer race meetings to host so not as many as some people assume.

The majority of the HB Guineas meeting went North to the Waikato.

Trentham got off lightly with only two or three extra meetings.  Hardly a hammering.

Waverley has taken up the slack.  New Plymouth did SFA.

But Waverley is like Ashburton why didn't they push back?  Did both Clubs do a deal that secures track renovatipn funding and a license to race in the future?

I think you'll find Woodville decided they weren't able to provide a decent surface when the pin was pulled there.

Waverley did the decent thing for the industry but, their track will need time to recover.

Also remember Tauherenikau was shaky for a while too.

CD is not in good shape.  Matt Ballesty's comments were heavy handed and snacked if a new guy going to throw his weight around.  Then when Curious quoted Bruce Sharrock about any pot of gold they can find, what are we to think?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

When was it last a Premier Track?  That is a serious question.

when I was full time with camera and went there for 100+ meetings, 80's into the 90's,  'Our" best WFA races were being fought out on 'safe' racing services...   <---  dear I say, pre Over watering on said tracks! that has continued to this day!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, curious said:

Given that and the feedback from riders and trainers, they went ahead and put horses and riders at risk anyway. Tragic.

Pardon! that old elephant in the room problem! the jockeys  have been legged  up! to go around! to Prove that the tracks was not safe! sigh...   When the next big crash on the track happens with this sort of back story about now it seems so many tracks! 

Jockeys should not be used as TrackTestDummys!!!  

Talking about finding a needed Voice!  What has the Jockeys Assoc been saying????

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...