curious Posted yesterday at 08:02 AM Posted yesterday at 08:02 AM Do you think this announcement might have slightly upset @Reefton? Meeting News Waverley 28 January Stakes to $25,000 The Waverley twilight meeting on Wednesday 28 January will run for stakes of $25,000 for all eight races. This brings it in line with all twilight Wednesdays from mid-January through to the end of March. So the ONLY Wednesday meeting this year that didn't get twilight funding was ??? And to make matters worse, Reefton on a weekday with industry funding did oncourse turnover of $132k. The following Sunday, ATR (feature meeting at Ellerslie qith 460k stakes) just managed 100k. 2 Quote
Special Agent Posted yesterday at 08:18 AM Posted yesterday at 08:18 AM The wording is beautiful, isn't it. From mid-January ... How is the disparity between stake money and on-course turnovers for the two clubs explained away? 1 Quote
Murray Fish Posted yesterday at 08:31 AM Posted yesterday at 08:31 AM 28 minutes ago, curious said: And to make matters worse, Reefton on a weekday with industry funding did oncourse turnover of $132k. The following Sunday, ATR (feature meeting at Ellerslie qith 460k stakes) just managed 100k. any idea of the entrance money and the catering profits? Quote
Shad Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Well done reefton, good turnover for very small fields and a week day,any idea of off course turnover, may have been a 5$ entry, time to spread those stakes around a bit more, I'm sure some smaller clubs with better turnover be grateful. Quote
curious Posted 17 hours ago Author Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, Shad said: any idea of off course turnover, 1270.6k Quote
curious Posted 17 hours ago Author Posted 17 hours ago Kumara on course 430k Off 2.517k Ellerslie off course 2.488k Quote
curious Posted 16 hours ago Author Posted 16 hours ago Sorry, the above are total turnover where it says offcourse. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, curious said: Kumara on course 430k Off 2.517k Ellerslie off course 2.488k I'm not sure what your point is. You aren't exactly comparing apples with apples. For a start: Kumara had 9 races. Ellerslie had 8 races. 1 Quote
curious Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: I'm not sure what your point is. You aren't exactly comparing apples with apples. For a start: Kumara had 9 races. Ellerslie had 8 races. My point was about Reefton. Turnover per race was 311k Ellerslie (stakes 460k) 280k Kumara (stakes 240k) Edited 15 hours ago by curious 1 Quote
mikeynz Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) I think you actually find those good on course turnovers at many of the small holiday venues is pushed by tote betting by the non regular race goers, they don't care about fixed odds, probably don't care about horse racing that much either but just enjoying the summer outings that become traditional for many. Edited 13 hours ago by mikeynz Quote
curious Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago Yes probably right @mikeynz. More important for the benefit of the club itself too than the wider industry since they get the majority of the wagering profit from that. Quote
Huey Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 4 hours ago, mikeynz said: I think you actually find those good on course turnovers at many of the small holiday venues is pushed by tote betting by the non regular race goers, they don't care about fixed odds, probably don't care about horse racing that much either but just enjoying the summer outings that become traditional for many. What do you mean , turnover is turnover in total figures in my understanding? Quote
mikeynz Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just now, Huey said: What do you mean , turnover is turnover in total figures in my understanding? Holiday meetings have lots of holiday makers who may not have, TAB accounts, and obviously with a good crowd on course turnovers are good , not rocket science.....like most things be nice to get all these figures broken down, I'm sure Omakau on Jan 2 would be interesting. Quote
curious Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago 2 minutes ago, mikeynz said: Holiday meetings have lots of holiday makers who may not have, TAB accounts, and obviously with a good crowd on course turnovers are good , not rocket science.....like most things be nice to get all these figures broken down, I'm sure Omakau on Jan 2 would be interesting. You are probably right. Kumara and Reefton the oncourse was about 50/50 terminal:digital. Ellersle was about 25/75 Quote
Huey Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, mikeynz said: Holiday meetings have lots of holiday makers who may not have, TAB accounts, and obviously with a good crowd on course turnovers are good , not rocket science.....like most things be nice to get all these figures broken down, I'm sure Omakau on Jan 2 would be interesting. I understand, but I thought the assessment was on turnover figures not the type of turnover. Those scenarios have little to do with total turnover in my view. Quote
Special Agent Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I think a valid point is the fact that clubs only receive commission from oncourse turnover. Reefton's might go a tad further than Ellerslie's. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.