curious Posted yesterday at 08:02 AM Posted yesterday at 08:02 AM Do you think this announcement might have slightly upset @Reefton? Meeting News Waverley 28 January Stakes to $25,000 The Waverley twilight meeting on Wednesday 28 January will run for stakes of $25,000 for all eight races. This brings it in line with all twilight Wednesdays from mid-January through to the end of March. So the ONLY Wednesday meeting this year that didn't get twilight funding was ??? And to make matters worse, Reefton on a weekday with industry funding did oncourse turnover of $132k. The following Sunday, ATR (feature meeting at Ellerslie qith 460k stakes) just managed 100k. 2 Quote
Special Agent Posted yesterday at 08:18 AM Posted yesterday at 08:18 AM The wording is beautiful, isn't it. From mid-January ... How is the disparity between stake money and on-course turnovers for the two clubs explained away? 1 Quote
Murray Fish Posted yesterday at 08:31 AM Posted yesterday at 08:31 AM 28 minutes ago, curious said: And to make matters worse, Reefton on a weekday with industry funding did oncourse turnover of $132k. The following Sunday, ATR (feature meeting at Ellerslie qith 460k stakes) just managed 100k. any idea of the entrance money and the catering profits? Quote
Shad Posted yesterday at 03:04 PM Posted yesterday at 03:04 PM Well done reefton, good turnover for very small fields and a week day,any idea of off course turnover, may have been a 5$ entry, time to spread those stakes around a bit more, I'm sure some smaller clubs with better turnover be grateful. Quote
curious Posted yesterday at 05:12 PM Author Posted yesterday at 05:12 PM 2 hours ago, Shad said: any idea of off course turnover, 1270.6k Quote
curious Posted yesterday at 05:16 PM Author Posted yesterday at 05:16 PM Kumara on course 430k Off 2.517k Ellerslie off course 2.488k Quote
curious Posted yesterday at 05:45 PM Author Posted yesterday at 05:45 PM Sorry, the above are total turnover where it says offcourse. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted yesterday at 06:56 PM Posted yesterday at 06:56 PM 1 hour ago, curious said: Kumara on course 430k Off 2.517k Ellerslie off course 2.488k I'm not sure what your point is. You aren't exactly comparing apples with apples. For a start: Kumara had 9 races. Ellerslie had 8 races. 1 Quote
curious Posted yesterday at 07:07 PM Author Posted yesterday at 07:07 PM (edited) 11 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: I'm not sure what your point is. You aren't exactly comparing apples with apples. For a start: Kumara had 9 races. Ellerslie had 8 races. My point was about Reefton. Turnover per race was 311k Ellerslie (stakes 460k) 280k Kumara (stakes 240k) Edited yesterday at 07:09 PM by curious 1 Quote
mikeynz Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago (edited) I think you actually find those good on course turnovers at many of the small holiday venues is pushed by tote betting by the non regular race goers, they don't care about fixed odds, probably don't care about horse racing that much either but just enjoying the summer outings that become traditional for many. Edited 23 hours ago by mikeynz Quote
curious Posted 21 hours ago Author Posted 21 hours ago Yes probably right @mikeynz. More important for the benefit of the club itself too than the wider industry since they get the majority of the wagering profit from that. Quote
Huey Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 4 hours ago, mikeynz said: I think you actually find those good on course turnovers at many of the small holiday venues is pushed by tote betting by the non regular race goers, they don't care about fixed odds, probably don't care about horse racing that much either but just enjoying the summer outings that become traditional for many. What do you mean , turnover is turnover in total figures in my understanding? Quote
mikeynz Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Just now, Huey said: What do you mean , turnover is turnover in total figures in my understanding? Holiday meetings have lots of holiday makers who may not have, TAB accounts, and obviously with a good crowd on course turnovers are good , not rocket science.....like most things be nice to get all these figures broken down, I'm sure Omakau on Jan 2 would be interesting. Quote
curious Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago 2 minutes ago, mikeynz said: Holiday meetings have lots of holiday makers who may not have, TAB accounts, and obviously with a good crowd on course turnovers are good , not rocket science.....like most things be nice to get all these figures broken down, I'm sure Omakau on Jan 2 would be interesting. You are probably right. Kumara and Reefton the oncourse was about 50/50 terminal:digital. Ellersle was about 25/75 1 Quote
Huey Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 6 hours ago, mikeynz said: Holiday meetings have lots of holiday makers who may not have, TAB accounts, and obviously with a good crowd on course turnovers are good , not rocket science.....like most things be nice to get all these figures broken down, I'm sure Omakau on Jan 2 would be interesting. I understand, but I thought the assessment was on turnover figures not the type of turnover. Those scenarios have little to do with total turnover in my view. Quote
Special Agent Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago I think a valid point is the fact that clubs only receive commission from oncourse turnover. Reefton's might go a tad further than Ellerslie's. 1 Quote
Shad Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 18 hours ago, mikeynz said: I think you actually find those good on course turnovers at many of the small holiday venues is pushed by tote betting by the non regular race goers, they don't care about fixed odds, probably don't care about horse racing that much either but just enjoying the summer outings that become traditional for many. Interesting one, for me holiday makers, i wouldn't imagine spending up to much on betting, then I guess if theirs enough of them may make a difference. Quote
curious Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 10 hours ago, Huey said: I understand, but I thought the assessment was on turnover figures not the type of turnover. Those scenarios have little to do with total turnover in my view. My headpost was initially comparing the relative ONCOURSE turnovers. Quote
mikeynz Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) If you use the app to bet when you are on course, is that classed as on course betting figures ,I'd say no but I stand to be proven wrong, purchase is not taken on oncourse setup. Edited 1 hour ago by mikeynz Quote
curious Posted 55 minutes ago Author Posted 55 minutes ago 29 minutes ago, mikeynz said: If you use the app to bet when you are on course, is that classed as on course betting figures ,I'd say no but I stand to be proven wrong, purchase is not taken on oncourse setup. Yes. That's what I showed above as oncourse digital cf oncourse terminal. Clubs get a higher commission for digital on course turnover. Quote
mikeynz Posted 2 minutes ago Posted 2 minutes ago On 1/16/2026 at 9:02 PM, curious said: Do you think this announcement might have slightly upset @Reefton? Meeting News Waverley 28 January Stakes to $25,000 The Waverley twilight meeting on Wednesday 28 January will run for stakes of $25,000 for all eight races. This brings it in line with all twilight Wednesdays from mid-January through to the end of March. So the ONLY Wednesday meeting this year that didn't get twilight funding was ??? And to make matters worse, Reefton on a weekday with industry funding did oncourse turnover of $132k. The following Sunday, ATR (feature meeting at Ellerslie qith 460k stakes) just managed 100k. Based on your reply to my question, does bets placed on apps on course count as on course betting, then the 100k on Ellerslie continues to emphasize that for the size of Auckland no one goes racing or gives a shit about it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.