Thomass Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Strange one this...being an exemplary license holder in the past it's hard to believe he would risk a DQ from a refusal... ...and shirley he'd know this...right? It's EXACTLY the same penalty as providing a + test "Cody William Cole holds a Class A Trainers Licence, issued by New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing (NZTA). Mr Cole is facing one charge pursuant to Rule 801(1)(k) of the New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing Rules that on Thursday the 24th July 2025, at the Matamata Racecourse, Licenced Class A Trainer Cody Cole wilfully failed to perform an act ordered by an Investigator to be performed by him in that he failed to provide for a drug test and is thereby liable to the penalty imposed pursuant to Rule 801(2) of the said rules." Quote
Stagman Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Yes, let's wait and see if he's one of the protected species. Young trainer showing a lot of ability in the training ranks- however the rules are for everybody. No doubt in his submissions on penalty there will more than likely be a few letters of support from the elite owners in the industry that he trains for. What would a DQ look like for him- well probably only stop him going to the tracks races an trials- just stay on the farm and train from there. There's bound to be someone waiting in the wings with a Trainers license application ready in case the worst happens and Mr Cole has a holiday over Autumn/ Winter until the end of the season. Quote
curious Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Stagman said: Yes, let's wait and see if he's one of the protected species. Young trainer showing a lot of ability in the training ranks- however the rules are for everybody. No doubt in his submissions on penalty there will more than likely be a few letters of support from the elite owners in the industry that he trains for. What would a DQ look like for him- well probably only stop him going to the tracks races an trials- just stay on the farm and train from there. There's bound to be someone waiting in the wings with a Trainers license application ready in case the worst happens and Mr Cole has a holiday over Autumn/ Winter until the end of the season. There's a difference between a DQ which is possible, and a suspension which is likely. He seems to have worsened the penalty by pleading not guilty and only providing frivolous and largely unbelievable evidence to support his defence. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Stagman said: There's bound to be someone waiting in the wings with a Trainers license application ready in case the worst happens and Mr Cole has a holiday over Autumn/ Winter until the end of the season. What's wrong with that? Quote
Huey Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Should have been suspended months ago, this has been common knowledge for sometime. Be pretty pissed if running 2nd to this guy whilst he is accumulating wins on premiership. Come in @Chief Stipe with some obscure excuse for him. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 28 minutes ago, Huey said: Be pretty pissed if running 2nd to this guy whilst he is accumulating wins on premiership. I don't see the connection are you saying that without Cole his horses would run second? Quote
Huey Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: I don't see the connection are you saying that without Cole his horses would run second? They would not be there in his name would they. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, Huey said: They would not be there in his name would they. Still don't get your point. It's not as if you get any reward for being 9th on the Trainers Premiership. Delaying litigation is a common legal tactic and I see no problem with that either. Quote
Murray Fish Posted 44 minutes ago Posted 44 minutes ago perhaps more important that this person got caught??? https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360933499/italian-biathlete-rebecca-passler-suspended-ahead-winter-olympics-positive-doping-test Quote
Huey Posted 39 minutes ago Posted 39 minutes ago 26 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: Still don't get your point. It's not as if you get any reward for being 9th on the Trainers Premiership. Delaying litigation is a common legal tactic and I see no problem with that either. Do those horses still win without him? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.