Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Jewels - Turnover


Happy Sunrise

Recommended Posts

Seems like people enjoyed punting on the day. Good for harness.

Near record turnover for Jewels

6 June 2019 

by Michael Guerin

The first Jewels held at Addington has overcome the worst weather in the meeting’s history to boast near record turnover.

And the numbers have left bedraggled harness racing administrators beaming.

Saturday’s nine group-one meeting looked in danger of being postponed just hours before the first race as Canterbury was lashed by extreme weather and a giant puddle formed inside the track threatening to encroach on the racing surface at the 1000m mark.

But with the drains working overtime and the recently re-surfaced track overseen by John Denton, the meeting not only went ahead but provided fair racing.

And while the weather impacted the walk-up crowd, the betting figures have been surprisingly positive considering the conditions and the large number of odds-on favourites, which can often be off-putting for punters from the two other codes.

The combined on and off-course domestic turnover was $2,547,222, of which $974,816 was fixed odds.

That is already the third highest amount ever invested domestically on a Harness Jewels meeting and with the Australian turnover expected to come in around $750,000 the meeting should have Australasia-wide turnover close to $3.5million, without counting money bet with corporate bookmakers.

That will mean the meeting has the second highest Australasian turnover in the Jewels’s 13-year history with the only higher one coming when the Queensland Oaks meeting at Eagle Farm and several other Australian fixtures were abandoned in 2016, creating record figures for the Cambridge-run Jewels that season.

“We couldn’t be happier,” says HRNZ’s Darrin Williams.

“Sure the weather was brutal but the betting figures make up for that.

“I really feel for Addington because they put their heart and soul into the day and did a super job and the weather was against them.

“But they already had a good crowd and the only under-utilised area they had was the marquee on top of the stables which would have been great but for the weather, which nobody could control.

“So the results are very pleasing, especially the way the track responded. That is a real credit to John Denton and his staff.” Had Saturday’s meeting being held at Ashburton, who did a great job with their first six running of the Jewels, the weather would have had a far more dire impact.

Next year’s Jewels return to Cambridge in the annual inter-island rotation with the Waikato track to host a two-day meeting, racing the Friday night before the Jewels on the Saturday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turnover was good because it was held at Addington Raceway over a far better distance than the damn mile.

It was also a crappy day weather wise throughout the country, so people were not out and about, therefore watered watching tV.

What was the Oncourse turnover like????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Brodie said:

Turnover was good because it was held at Addington Raceway over a far better distance than the damn mile.

It was also a crappy day weather wise throughout the country, so people were not out and about, therefore watered watching tV.

What was the Oncourse turnover like????

On course turnover is largely irrelevant, I was there and bet all day on my phone like most others, would you seriously trust half the tote staff with one of your bets, I don't think so

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Westview said:

would you seriously trust half the tote staff with one of your bets, I don't think so

Unless the Brodster was tote staff behind the machine putting my $10, 5% first four betslip through ....with a lightning flick of a pen he would mark in the the horses I missed...when I won, I would be thinking I had somehow marked the wrong horses (again) but this time I won...miracle

Like a punting angel that Brodie...?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

Unless the Brodster was tote staff behind the machine putting my $10, 5% first four betslip through ....with a lightning flick of a pen he would mark in the the horses I missed...when I won, I would be thinking I had somehow marked the wrong horses (again) but this time I won...miracle

Like a punting angel that Brodie...?

Brodster the Messiah!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Westview said:

On course turnover is largely irrelevant, I was there and bet all day on my phone like most others, would you seriously trust half the tote staff with one of your bets, I don't think so

I believe oncourse turnover is important, the point being is that The Jewels is meant to Be a showpiece for harness racing in NZ.

There is always a massive buildup for months about The Jewels!

To Get new people involved and investing on Harness Racing, we need the new people on course to experience the racing.

Doubt whether there would be too many new people going down to the TAB just to invest on the Jewels.

The weather certainly didn’t help the cause unfortunately.

I appreciate that many do bet on their phones at the races on their accounts, but these are existing enthusiasts and not the new ones that the industry needs.

Jewels Day with all of its costs, would lose a significant amount of money, so would be interesting to know how many extra people are being attracted?

Edited by Brodie
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brodie said:

Jewels Day with all of its costs, would lose a significant amount of money, so would be interesting to know how many extra people are being attracted?

Interesting and very valid point made Brodie.

The marketing/promotion for the Jewels didn't cut it this year, despite this aspect undoubtedly being a significant expense. It missed the mark and didn't get the message home to non-racing people. The marketing geniuses with degrees etc had the right intention and implemented a wide coverage of billboards etc but the point was missed on the potential customers.  

As a comparison, rewind back to 2003 and the Inter-dominions held at Addington. The marketing and promotion for that was brilliant. Non-racing people knew what it was about, it generated interest within the mainstream public and dragged a few new faces to the track. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brodie said:

I believe oncourse turnover is important, the point being is that The Jewels is meant to Be a showpiece for harness racing in NZ.

There is always a massive buildup for months about The Jewels!

To Get new people involved and investing on Harness Racing, we need the new people on course to experience the racing.

Doubt whether there would be too many new people going down to the TAB just to invest on the Jewels.

The weather certainly didn’t help the cause unfortunately.

I appreciate that many do bet on their phones at the races on their accounts, but these are existing enthusiasts and not the new ones that the industry needs.

Jewels Day with all of its costs, would lose a significant amount of money, so would be interesting to know how many extra people are being attracted?

Good post Brodie. 

  • Like 1
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Brodie said:

Don’t the clubs get a bigger % for money wagered oncourse than what they do offcourse?

I would’ve thought that the clubs would prefer wagering with them rather than phones or agencies?

 

back in jack hammers day yes

however i think that changed quite a while back

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Brodie said:

Don’t the clubs get a bigger % for money wagered oncourse than what they do offcourse?

I would’ve thought that the clubs would prefer wagering with them rather than phones or agencies?

 

Correct - more money directly to the club from on course turnover .

Very important  .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LongOwner said:

Still higher % for on course 

I thought it was, wouldn’t bet on it though!

Need new people oncourse as well for revenue to the clubs from food and beverage!

If everyone is not going to bet oncourse and on their phones, then no point having window sellers etc.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LongOwner said:

Still higher % for on course 

Long owner you are right long ago there was a difference but currently you are mistaken the current hrnz payment is based on the total turnover. Brodie how could you doubt Westview. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Brodie said:

I thought it was, wouldn’t bet on it though!

Need new people oncourse as well for revenue to the clubs from food and beverage!

If everyone is not going to bet oncourse and on their phones, then no point having window sellers etc.

 

 

Brodsters Fence.jpg

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Westview said:

Long owner you are right long ago there was a difference but currently you are mistaken the current hrnz payment is based on the total turnover. Brodie how could you doubt Westview. 

Never doubted  you for one minute Westview!

If you say that there is no differential now, then I believe you!

What I do know is that harness clubs do need oncourse attendance as you well know.

Great that you like to use your account to bet on by phone.

The TAB Bookmakers are hardly encouraging punters to bet with them nowadays!!!!

What they are now doing is referring bets and coming back with even more pathetic amounts being able to be won, which makes it pointless to even accept what they have offered!!!!

You don’t accept what they have offered you, but slash the odds anyway!!!!

How on earth is this what should be happening with racing in NZ????

Racing in NZ is stuffed, with this crap going on!

 

  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...