Newmarket Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 82 Dogs from one stable, out of 116 starters? Wow, is this good for the game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaman Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 7 hours ago, Newmarket said: 82 Dogs from one stable, out of 116 starters? Wow, is this good for the game? Short answer no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milo Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Not having those 82 dogs wouldn’t be good either.Probably wouldn’t have a meeting at all. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitofaLegend Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 3 hours ago, Milo said: Not having those 82 dogs wouldn’t be good either.Probably wouldn’t have a meeting at all. Doesnt the CD have too many dogs though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 8 hours ago, Milo said: Not having those 82 dogs wouldn’t be good either.Probably wouldn’t have a meeting at all. There would be a meeting people cant get a start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milo Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 Not having those 82 dogs wouldn’t be good either.Probably wouldn’t have a meeting at all.Im talking about Southland as I think that’s what Newmarket is referring too 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whatever Goes Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 1 hour ago, Mehe said: There would be a meeting people cant get a start Yea but they'd be like the cards in the North! Mostly Cambridge, week in week out their card is full of dogs that clearly despise the place but still get nom'd cause they can't get starts at their favoured Akl circuit, or people are using race days as training runs. Quality must prevail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CrossCodes Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 On 8/03/2020 at 1:26 AM, Newmarket said: 82 Dogs from one stable, out of 116 starters? Wow, is this good for the game? What’s worse is what happens to those dogs once they finish racing, I don’t know how they get away with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaman Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 What i cannot understand is, why no follow up on all dogs by the RIU. They have the figure's from the NZGRA of all dogs chipped and branded. How many are being put down by a Vet as against those just disappearing down a hole. Have not seen one charge yet against any trainer or owner from disposing a dog illegally. This tells me that an awful lot of dogs are just vanishing. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 (edited) Don't get me wrong, I don't approve whatsoever of what's been happening to all the no longer or non-viable dogs. What the real issue is here is there are NO rules against putting a dog down. What there is a rule for now (only just recently) is putting a dog down while at the track. https://www.grnz.co.nz/Files/Documents/On-Track Euthanasia Guidelines for OTVs FINAL Dec 2019.pdf Once you get them back home, nothing has changed. https://www.grnz.co.nz/Files/GRNZ Veterinary Certificate of Death Policy.pdf 108. NOTIFICATION OF DEATH 108.1 No person may knowingly participate in causing the unnatural death of any Greyhound, other than by accepted euthanasia by a Veterinarian or in a medical emergency. 108.2 A Licensed Person may humanely euthanize a Greyhound in an extreme medical emergency provided that the Licensed Person immediately advises the Association in writing of the death and the relevant circumstances. 108.3 Within 14 days of the death of any Greyhound the Trainer or where the Greyhound does not have a Trainer, the Owner shall return the Certificate of Registration along with a Veterinarian’s certificate certifying the death of the Greyhound. 108.4 The Association, or appointed agent, shall have the right to order an autopsy, to confirm cause of death. 108.5 Any person found in breach of this Rule or who subject to Rule 108.2 knowingly participates in causing the unnatural death of any Greyhound, other than by accepted euthanasia by a Veterinarian, is subject to a fine of up to $10,000 and/or permanent disqualification from involvement in any way in Greyhound Racing in New Zealand. So as long as you're able to find a vet who has the morals that makes them think it's ok to kill a perfectly healthy dog either at their office or at the kennels, then it's within the rules as long as GRNZ receives their certificate of death form within 14 days of the jab. So it's business as usual folks, until LP'S and/or public pressure fin ally gets the GRNZ board to really sort it out. Edited March 8, 2020 by Yankiwi 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwigreys Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 On 3/8/2020 at 8:37 AM, aquaman said: Short answer no. No different than what Cole does in the CD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Four shaw Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 Seen Coles Chargers Last Week Pretty Horrible and Disgusting ⚠️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty5 Posted March 12, 2020 Share Posted March 12, 2020 Hope they all travelled safely ? and are all still alive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.