Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

AWT those anti please look


Pitman

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Brodie said:

Allweather tracks are not the answer that Nzracing needs to get out of the shite.

Key point.

There is far more than one problem in the industry. Throwing millions at an AWT, two or three does not get RITA out of the shit at all.

Their entire focus should be on cutting costs and increasing revenue. If they ARE somehow are successful completing step one then and only then should they think about the longer term.

Entire industry demise is so eminent. AWT's will mean nothing if they don't fix right here and now first. It's not the time for long term investment.

  • Like 2
  • Champ Post 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Yankiwi said:

AWT's will mean nothing if they don't fix right here and now first. It's not the time for long term investment.

Especially when you have underutilised tracks that cost next to nothing for the industry to run on. 

Instead we are going to essentially corporatise new assets with their inherent management and maintenance costs unless of course the trainers and club members turn up to help rake the new AWT's.

Of course Harness nor the Greyhounds got any capital out of the PGF.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Especially when you have underutilised tracks that cost next to nothing for the industry to run on. 

Instead we are going to essentially corporatise new assets with their inherent management and maintenance costs unless of course the trainers and club members turn up to help rake the new AWT's.

Of course Harness nor the Greyhounds got any capital out of the PGF.

There is a large dollop of self interest at the heart of the debate . Haven't heard from anybody outside of the 3 tracks getting them speak out how great they will be for the industry .

Certainly none of the many punters i know have expressed their delight and their intentions of increasing their betting as a consequence . 

  • Like 3
  • Champ Post 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nomates said:

Certainly none of the many punters i know have expressed their delight and their intentions of increasing their betting as a consequence . 

Nor the ones I talk to.  I'm picking if there was the choice between a race on AWT in NZ vs a Grass Track in OZ the latter would win.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If these all weather tracks were so good, why hasn’t Riccarton for example been putting money away to make one?

If they haven’t  got the money then what makes them think that the taxpayer should pay for it and it is money well spent!

interesting times ahead!

 

  • Like 2
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Brodie said:

If they haven’t  got the money then what makes them think that the taxpayer should pay for it and it is money well spent!

 

A better question is why did the Cambridge Jockey Club need $10m of taxpayers money if they are the "largest training centre in Australasia"?

  • Like 2
  • Champ Post 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Pitman said:

Riccarton may eventually get close to 40 meetings a year, as other tracks are closed, they will not all be run on the AWT. Can you not get your head around that

I train at Riccarton never heard of having close to 1600 horses there

Cambridge might but a lot of them are trial, sell, RTR horses that never race in NZ

so 30 on AWT at Riccarton, 40 at Awapuni , I guess 50 at Cambridge. NZ racing is really going to become a snorefest!

Hello world look at our quality racing here on an AWT track from Riccarton on a Wednesday start punting on it, don't worry about that silly racing from Sandown or Warwick Farm Sydney on the grass , this AWT racing is seriously exciting!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Huey said:

so 30 on AWT at Riccarton, 40 at Awapuni , I guess 50 at Cambridge.

No! There are 6 AWT meetings scheduled for the AW at Cambridge next season. Add maybe 1 or 2 transfers. Most Riccarton meetings will be on the turf. Perhaps a similar half a dozen on the AW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, curious said:

No! There are 6 AWT meetings scheduled for the AW at Cambridge next season. Add maybe 1 or 2 transfers. Most Riccarton meetings will be on the turf. Perhaps a similar half a dozen on the AW.

Ok, so AWT is up and running in May, thats 6 meetings in first 3 months(Last 3 months of season)?

Seriously Curious you think they'll only schedule 6 meetings there a season? I can't see it, that might be the end scenario but I doubt it once its up and going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Huey said:

Ok, so AWT is up and running in May, thats 6 meetings in first 3 months(Last 3 months of season)?

Seriously Curious you think they'll only schedule 6 meetings there a season? I can't see it, that might be the end scenario but I doubt it once its up and going.

Yes, I imagine they'll be used mainly in the winter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, curious said:

Yes, I imagine they'll be used mainly in the winter.

 

If you take Riccarton as an example (correct me if I'm wrong Pitty) but I think they've been running about 27 meetings a year there on the grass and my understanding is that the committee feels that has the grass course pretty maxed out. If they go to 40 meetings there, then you'd think that might mean say 15 of them on the AW, mostly over winter. I guess there's also the possibility that some meetings could be run using both courses as is common in the US between dirt and turf.

Edited by curious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, curious said:

If you take Riccarton as an example (correct me if I'm wrong Pitty) but I think they've been running about 27 meetings a year there on the grass and my understanding is that the committee feels that has the grass course pretty maxed out. If they go to 40 meetings there, then you'd think that might mean say 15 of them on the AW, mostly over winter. I guess there's also the possibility that some meetings could be run using both courses as is common in the US between dirt and turf.

Then how are you going to get a return on investment?  Plus pay for the increase in operational costs?

  • Like 2
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Then how are you going to get a return on investment?  Plus pay for the increase in operational costs?

I think UE is saying the return maybe from training on them, that may well be the case and I hope so given their cost and I can't see punters warming to them after the initial novelty factor wears off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Huey said:

I think UE is saying the return maybe from training on them, that may well be the case and I hope so given their cost and I can't see punters warming to them after the initial novelty factor wears off.

1,200 horses a month train at Cambridge yet that isn't enough for them to fund an AWT without a Govenrment handout AND a promise of $750k from NZTR.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

Then how are you going to get a return on investment?  Plus pay for the increase in operational costs?

I don't think you are. I didn't say that did I? I think the $20m the industry has to find for them would likely be better spent on existing tracks at this point.

Edited by curious
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, curious said:

I don't think you are. I didn't say that did I? I think the $20m the industry has to find for them would likely be better spent on existing tracks at this point.

Surely someone in this industry has done some numbers on this , to see how it can work? I mean surely??? Without government handouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the 70 plus horses who galloped at Rangiora this morning go where if it is got rid of as Mr Pitman suggests, certainly not 40 minutes down the road to Riccarton. Most North Canterbury trainers own their own properties and use the Rangiora track, they are not tenants as are most Riccarton trainers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Huey said:

Surely someone in this industry has done some numbers on this , to see how it can work? I mean surely??? Without government handouts.

Johnny AlLen thought he had struck the jackpot too when he paid Paddy Power mega millions for a effed up betting platform that has effed racing!

Unfortunately racing in Nz seems to want to employ people in their executive roles that haven’t really got the clues financially.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Brodie said:

Johnny AlLen thought he had struck the jackpot too when he paid Paddy Power mega millions for a effed up betting platform that has effed racing!

Unfortunately racing in Nz seems to want to employ people in their executive roles that haven’t really got the clues financially.

Well you can look at your political mates for this problem. Nathan Clown as Minister who knew nothing about racing appointed a National Party hack, Glenda Hughes who knew nothing about racing as the Racing Board Chair  and she apponted a broken down state servant who also knew nothing about racing as the CEO.

  • Like 2
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bloke said:

Well you can look at your political mates for this problem. Nathan Clown as Minister who knew nothing about racing appointed a National Party hack, Glenda Hughes who knew nothing about racing as the Racing Board Chair  and she apponted a broken down state servant who also knew nothing about racing as the CEO.

Bloke, don’t care who appointed Hughes or John Allen, why does that matter?

What matters surely is that racing is stuffed now and there does not appear to be any way of getting out of the shite.

Harness appointing Mr Holden as temporary CEO or whatever is also a worry as from his resume of past management roles, does not inspire much confidence unfortunately.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...