Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

Track preparation


curious

Recommended Posts

With the Foxton trials canned today after the track was presented as a G3 with a forecast of overnight rain (2.7mms in the last 24 hours to date) could we not please adopt a track prep policy more in line with that of Racing Victoria's below? Especially, given the pressure on horse welfare issues.

 

Clubs are requested to prepare the following racing surface for flat races:

• A track that is prepared with give in the interests of horse welfare;

• A track with a rating of GOOD for all races;

In seeking to prepare their racing surface in accordance with the guidelines, Clubs should:

• Prepare a track that is a GOOD 4 for at least the first race of the meeting;

• Prepare a track that is never FIRM; and

• Not place compliance with this guidance in advance of an accurate track rating.

 

Edited by curious
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Previous Rating New Rating Numerical Rating Description of Numerical Rating
Fast Firm 1 Dry hard track
Good Firm 2 Firm track with reasonable grass coverage
Good Good 3 Track with good grass coverage and cushion
Dead Good 4 Track with some give in it
Dead Soft 5 Track with a reasonable amount of give in it
Slow Soft 6 Moist but not badly affected track
Slow Soft 7 More rain-affected track that will chop up
Heavy Heavy 8 Rain affected track that horses will get into
Heavy Heavy 9 Wet track getting into a squelchy area
Heavy Heavy 10 Heaviest category track, very wet, towards saturation
Edited by curious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, curious said:

Why? Can't they just put a couple of inches on on Tuesday?

 

Depends on where the field capacity and moisture content is on the Tuesday.  My gut feel says you couldn't let the track get to a G2 and expect to bring it back to a D4/5 with one watering.  If you get hot temperatures and a Nor-Wester then a D4 would turn into a G2 really quickly.

Those penetrometer readings that are listed only work if the penetrometer is calibrated to local conditions e.g. soil type structure etc.  Aren't some tracks using another device as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chief Stipe said:

 Aren't some tracks using another device as well?

You mean looking out the window like Nostradamus suggested? Sometimes I think they don't even do that. Maybe just stick their finger out the window and assess the moisture content from there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Depends on where the field capacity and moisture content is on the Tuesday.  My gut feel says you couldn't let the track get to a G2 and expect to bring it back to a D4/5 with one watering.  If you get hot temperatures and a Nor-Wester then a D4 would turn into a G2 really quickly.

Yes, but surely historic soil moisture monitoring would indicate how best to do this wouldn't it? They'd presumably be holding it in a D4-6 range leading up to the final Tuesday irrigation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, curious said:

You mean looking out the window like Nostradamus suggested? Sometimes I think they don't even do that. Maybe just stick their finger out the window and assess the moisture content from there?

Well the Riccarton Track Manager referred to "moisture content" of 34% leading up to the 3rd of October and 38% leading up to Saturday.  Seem fairly fine measurements to me.  Although the relationship between track firmness and moisture content would also require some localised calibration I imagine.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, curious said:

They'd presumably be holding it in a D4-6 range leading up to the final Tuesday irrigation?

That in my opinion would be the only way to make it to Tuesday with enough buffer to assess the forecast and decide how much in the last irrigation.  Of course they can always override that by getting permission from the NZTR National Track manager assuming there still is one!

Of course there would be some input from local trainers who want to track gallop on the course proper between race days!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

That in my opinion would be the only way to make it to Tuesday with enough buffer to assess the forecast and decide how much in the last irrigation.  Of course they can always override that by getting permission from the NZTR National Track manager assuming there still is one!

Of course there would be some input from local trainers who want to track gallop on the course proper between race days!

dead 4 or 6 wouldn't be the last watering down south say like Riccarton with that norwest they get.wouldnt it dry out to much ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would suggest they just didn't want to run today as heavy rain was forecast only for today , and has arrived ,  hence cutting up the track . Plenty of times in the past they have watered the day before trials when no rain forecast , so with Thursday free have allowed mother nature to water the track and a day to dry a bit . I have no issue with it as long as plenty of notice is given , which it was in this case . 

As for standards , as far as i have seen it's every man ( track ) for themselves . Our tracks are too munted to get perfectly manicured race day tracks .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Running Man said:

what NZRT Track manager you talking about???

You tell me!  I think the title has changed but if a local track manager want's to irrigate after Tuesday for a Saturday meeting they have to get approval from the National Venue Inspector and the Stipes - according to the manual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Running Man said:

dead 4 or 6 wouldn't be the last watering down south say like Riccarton with that norwest they get.wouldnt it dry out to much ???

According to the Minimum Venue Guideline Standards document to water after Tuesday night requires National Venue Inspector and Stipes approval.  But yes I would agree that a Dead 4 on a Tuesday aiming for a G3 on Saturday would require irrigation during a hot Nor'West week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do they have that irrigation restriction? You'd think it should be left to clubs and track manaagers to decide in accord with local geography, climatic and soil conditions? I'm a bit surprised that clubs, the NZTA and Owners' Federation haven't been on their case to remove that restriction.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, curious said:

Why do they have that irrigation restriction? You'd think it should be left to clubs and track manaagers to decide in accord with local geography, climatic and soil conditions? I'm a bit surprised that clubs, the NZTA and Owners' Federation haven't been on their case to remove that restriction.

But is it a "guideline" or a "standard" or a "guideline standard" as per the title of the document?

Secondly I suspect that there is an unwritten rule now that you can irrigate up to Thursday night before a Saturday meeting and no one asks for permission.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

But is it a "guideline" or a "standard" or a "guideline standard" as per the title of the document?

Secondly I suspect that there is an unwritten rule now that you can irrigate up to Thursday night before a Saturday meeting and no one asks for permission.

 

wouldn't be a track manager in nz that would ask NZTR or Todd if they can water after tuesday

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

So you are saying that no one takes notice of the "guideline standards"?

Not much point introducing more acceptable guidelines in line with the Vic ones above if they are just going to be ignored by everyone and NZTR and the RIU turn a blind eye. It's possibly high time that track condition reporting was taken out of club hands and done independently at least on race mornings if not in the days leading up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, curious said:

Not much point introducing more acceptable guidelines in line with the Vic ones above if they are just going to be ignored by everyone and NZTR and the RIU turn a blind eye. It's possibly high time that track condition reporting was taken out of club hands and done independently at least on race mornings if not in the days leading up?

It was when it was taken out of Club hands and the Track Managers (formerly caretakers) had to dance to the tune of the NZTR Track Head Honcho whose name escapes me that the shit hit the fan more often Curious

Mikie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...