Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Riccarton Track - 11 March 2021. Another crap one?


Chief Stipe

Recommended Posts

Some odd things with the track rating movements.  Rail still out 11m.  Remember the last meeting?

RACE DAY
Weather: Overcast
Track: Dead 5
Rail: Out 11m | 7mm Rain Overnight 
Weather and Track last updated at 6.48am Thursday 11 March 
 
Wednesday afternoon
Weather: Raining
Track: Good 3
Rail: Out 11m 
Weather and Track last updated at 3.25pm Wednesday 10 March 
 
Wednesday afternoon
Weather: Drizzling
Track: Dead 4
Rail: Out 11m 
Weather and Track last updated at 2.29pm Wednesday 10 March 
 
Withdrawal morning
Weather: Fine 
Track: Dead 4
Rail: Out 11m | Irrigating 8mm tonight
Weather and Track last updated at 8.56am Tuesday 9 March 
 
 
Nomination Afternoon
Weather: Fine 
Track: Dead 4
Rail: Out 11m | Irrigating 8mm tonight
Weather and Track last updated at 3.50pm Monday 8 March
 
Nomination Morning
Weather: Fine 
Track: Dead 4
Rail: Out 11m
Weather and Track last updated at 9.18am Monday 8 March
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Pitman said:

Yes and you do believe in the tooth fairy, Santa Claus, etc

You ALMOST organised for the ACTUAL pen. Readings now 'Going stick' readings to be released didn't you?

What happened?  

Was it the Trackman's cabal who were embarrassed by the thought of TRANSPARENCY due to their 'irrigation' systems spraying all over the place?

Punters and other stake holders don't give a damn about red faces...

Just the FACTS...

If the RAILS OFF and over watered...

JUST SHOW US THE FIGURES

And then we'll invest...and save the Industry

How easy is that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pitman said:

I have asked for them at the last two race days and have yet to see them-bad joke

The presentation of Riccarton is a disgrace and it has been every since the last day of Cup meeting.  Too much listening to 'experts' who clearly know f all.  Get O'Malley in - he'll fix it.  A chisel plough all over it for a start to aerate it then get a half decent irrigation system.  For all that looking at the photos before the last meeting it is probably too far gone and wants ploughed and resown right now to try to get a half decent surface for next spring.  

Whatever they do it is a lottery - get the run in the right spot and you're halfway home.  NZTR need to demand some answers right now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Pitman said:

I have asked for them at the last two race days and have yet to see them-bad joke

And it's a sick joke...

Bernie goes on endlessly about needing PUNTERS...yet he refuses to get involved when it comes to embarrassing TRACKMEN and their screwed up watering systems...

Just show us the FIGURES Bernie....

Or get Matty Cross out there with the rest of the Jocks who take a personal going stick with them...let's us know the real feel Matty

Oh and on Thursday Matty said...

"should play fear across the width...of course it's tempo related"

FFS...yea na...

..not when the rails had the shit watered out of it Matty..get a grip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Thomass said:

Bernie goes on endlessly about needing PUNTERS...yet he refuses to get involved when it comes to embarrassing TRACKMEN and their screwed up watering systems...

 

In defence of the Trackman at Riccarton this week the last 7mm of water came from the clouds and poor soil structure and drainage aside would have provided optimal evenness in water coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/03/2021 at 11:42 PM, Reefton said:

The presentation of Riccarton is a disgrace and it has been every since the last day of Cup meeting.

The track has never been the same since Laing's half-arsed attempt at a reconstruction 25 years ago, the topsoil they removed was many hundreds of years in the making courtesy of Canterbury's north west gales and is/was irreplaceable. 

The CJC Board at the time who sanctioned the work have a lot to answer for.

  • Like 1
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Danny Frye had his neddy in the Fifth...

He watched the first two races and decided it was a Goat Track on the rails...

...and has his neddy had drawn two...he wasn't having a bar of the goat track and asked to late scratch

"Yea...na" said the Stupid Stipes..."very fast times...and no disadvantage we can see...

Scratches anyway and receives a 3 Hundy fine plus the late scratching fee of 3 hundy 

600 all up...to save his Mare losing points...and punters who backed her not knowing the rail was a...

Piece of SHIT....saved their hard earned

Thanks Danny and good on you for showing up this shit heap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/03/2021 at 11:45 AM, Chief Stipe said:

In defence of the Trackman at Riccarton this week the last 7mm of water came from the clouds and poor soil structure and drainage aside would have provided optimal evenness in water coverage.

As I said...Punters don't give a flying gig about how their track got to that state...

FFS...just give Punters the readings...already taken...

And let them decide where the best part of the track remains...

Without having to go out with a stick like Allpress does...it's already been done.."

...with the New Going Stick

How hard is it to give stake holders those figures FFS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Thomass said:

So Danny Frye had his neddy in the Fifth...

He watched the first two races and decided it was a Goat Track on the rails...

...and has his neddy had drawn two...he wasn't having a bar of the goat track and asked to late scratch

"Yea...na" said the Stupid Stipes..."very fast times...and no disadvantage we can see...

Scratches anyway and receives a 3 Hundy fine plus the late scratching fee of 3 hundy 

600 all up...to save his Mare losing points...and punters who backed her not knowing the rail was a...

Piece of SHIT....saved their hard earned

Thanks Danny and good on you for showing up this shit heap

Fantasy and Fiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Thomass said:

As I said...Punters don't give a flying gig about how their track got to that state...

FFS...just give Punters the readings...already taken...

And let them decide where the best part of the track remains...

Without having to go out with a stick like Allpress does...it's already been done.."

...with the New Going Stick

How hard is it to give stake holders those figures FFS?

Can you give us all a masterclass using a hypothetical scenario showing us how you as "NZ's most prolific tipster (after the race has run)" would apply this Going Stick information?

I'm sure many of us would be fascinated to understand and no doubt would help you lobby for this information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Fantasy and Fiction.

FFS

Mr Frye gave evidence that the track today held a bias towards mid to outside track, against inside drawn horses. He said that GELATO, owned by himself, had drawn two at the barrier and had she drawn towards the outside, he would not be before the Committee, seeking to late scratch her. He explained that GELATO would not have the ability to get out of that inside position over the early stages and would not be competitive for the punters and the horse's sake.

Mr Fyre stated that placegetters in the first two races, apart from the 3rd horse in the first race, had drawn out in the running and you do not have to be a rocket scientist to see where the winners are coming from, which was to the outside of the track. He added that any horse drawn down on the inside had compounded over the concluding stages in the first two races. Mr Frye stated that he did not think the filly would be any good on that ground on the inside and did not want to run the horse. He said that if GELATO did not go well today, he would lose a rating point and it could be difficult to get a run in the future.

Mr Davidson stated that the Riders had told him the track was inconsistent but there had been no change in track conditions and unlikely for any upgrade or downgrade of the track. He added horses were doing good times and the Stewards objected to the request to late scratch GELATO as there had not been a material change in track conditions. He added that the 3rd placed horse, VAN HALEN, in race 2, had drawn 2 at the barrier.

Reasons For Decision:

The Committee carefully considered all submissions and evidence presented with this request for a ruling.

This Committee found that Mr Frye had genuine concern for GELATO’S ability to handle the track from an inside draw of two, however, not a lot of evidence that the track was bias to mid to outside barrier draws, as there had been only 2 races and both those were from the 1200m shute. Several place getters in the first two races had raced from inside draws. Mr Davidson stated that the riders had informed him that the track was inconsistent but that they had no intention to upgrade or downgrade the track as would be required for a late scratching to be considered. This Committee ruled that the circumstances presented by Mr Frye did not pass the threshold required for the Committee to consider granting Mr Frye’s request to late scratch GELATO.  

Decision(s):

Mr Frye’s request for a ruling to late scratch GELATO is denied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are both smoking the same stuff?

The results don't show any bias with regard to draws.  But who would have known - not you.

That aside if any trainer had walked the track prior to scratching time they would have seen it's state.  "You would not have to be a rocket scientist to work that out"!  Expecting it to be any better than the previous raceday on the same part of the track would have required extreme optimism.  Perhaps Frye should have scratched as soon as the draws came out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reasonably rare for stakeholders to demand all the penetrometer readings for a meeting.  I did the Reefton ones (prior to race morning) and would gladly have produced the info.  There were variances but they were not consistent variances (if that makes sense).  

If you are asked and refuse to provide them then one can only conclude that you have something to hide?

I know Riccarton have the big money meetings but how long before trainers start to boycott them?  I know as an owner I am sick of getting the excuse that the horse got down on the fence and never had a hope.  And that two year old filly should have back type on Cup Day but got switched to the inner and the rest is history.  I only lease a share but if I owned her I would be quite shitty.  She has a stakes race in prospect in early May(assuming she gets there of course) but am I better buying a lotto ticket?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reefton said:

Reasonably rare for stakeholders to demand all the penetrometer readings for a meeting.  I did the Reefton ones (prior to race morning) and would gladly have produced the info.  There were variances but they were not consistent variances (if that makes sense).  

The Penetrometer or even the Going Stick won't tell you if the surface will break up and become shifty either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...