This Kiwi Mare is Better than Entriviere

[nomates]

12 minutes ago, curious said:

Probably the opposite to what I do. Don't necessarily back the horse I think most likely to win, rather the ones that I think are priced greater than what I rate their chance of winning.

Each to his own , but i don't see the point looking for an over priced horse if i don't think it can win . Saying that i am looking at more than one horse to start with but have usually narrowed it down to my pick by Saturday morning , once i know weather , track conditions , jockey , barrier etc . 

But good luck to you .

[Huey]

10 minutes ago, nomates said:

Each to his own , but i don't see the point looking for an over priced horse if i don't think it can win . Saying that i am looking at more than one horse to start with but have usually narrowed it down to my pick by Saturday morning , once i know weather , track conditions , jockey , barrier etc . 

But good luck to you .

You two way ahead of me I'm still backing nice names and lucky numbers!

[Chief Stipe]

Amarelinha was far too short in that race over 1400m back from a spell.  

[curious]

17 minutes ago, nomates said:

Each to his own , but i don't see the point looking for an over priced horse if i don't think it can win . Saying that i am looking at more than one horse to start with but have usually narrowed it down to my pick by Saturday morning , once i know weather , track conditions , jockey , barrier etc . 

But good luck to you .

They all have a chance. I just back the ones that have a significantly better chance imo than the market says. Has worked ok doing that in multiple jurisdictions the last 18 years or so. So, from my perspective I'll just keep doing what's working. Not that interested in backing what is most likely to win. That's what all the losers try to do.

Edited January 22, 2022 by curious

[curious]

3 minutes ago, curious said:

 

 

Edited January 22, 2022 by curious

[nomates]

1 minute ago, curious said:

Not that interested in backing what is most likely to win

Never said i back what is most likely to , i back what i think will win .

I backed Dragon Queen in the second because i thought it was due on form , good draw and better than the 1 win mare that she was , 21's way overs , the fav bloated the prices and i wasn't convinced she has really come up as a 4yo , which often happens with mares , so you should have backed the winner on what you are saying .

[nomates]

8 minutes ago, Huey said:

You two way ahead of me I'm still backing nice names and lucky numbers!

Got any nice names in the last 2 races , i need a hand .

[curious]

I reckon stick with 6, 8  and 13. They feel lucky.

 

[nomates]

7 minutes ago, curious said:

I reckon stick with 6, 8  and 13. They feel lucky.

 

Wrong 

[Huey]

1 hour ago, nomates said:

Got any nice names in the last 2 races , i need a hand .

In all honesty I'd have tipped the Stoney One so you saved your $$$

[holy ravioli]

17 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

Amarelinha was far too short in that race over 1400m back from a spell.  

1.6l from the winner in 1.22.6....not to dusty.

She's won over 1300m.

[holy ravioli]

Back to her best...Chief...strong second.🙃

[Chief Stipe]

9 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

Back to her best...Chief...strong second.🙃

I'm just trying to remember the last time you actually posted anything original, new or of interest?...... Mmmmmm never.

[holy ravioli]

37 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

I'm just trying to remember the last time you actually posted anything original, new or of interest?...... Mmmmmm never.

Robust discussion about the quality/ability of horses to bet on are always ..salient..imo.