-
Available Subscriptions
Trotting Chat
3,023 topics in this forum
-
- 8 replies
- 683 views
-
- 4 replies
- 326 views
-
- 5 replies
- 299 views
-
- 42 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 6 replies
- 370 views
-
- 6 replies
- 289 views
-
- 42 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 978 views
-
- 0 replies
- 103 views
-
- 20 replies
- 874 views
-
- 112 replies
- 9.8k views
-
- 21 replies
- 944 views
-
- 14 replies
- 652 views
-
- 5 replies
- 355 views
-
- 2 replies
- 239 views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 10 replies
- 767 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 15 replies
- 710 views
-
- 7 replies
- 813 views
-
- 1 reply
- 251 views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 305 views
-
- 37 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 36 replies
- 1.3k views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
I don't really see how the proposed new clause makes any difference to the current rule. This was tested rather frivolously a decade ago in the Morton case which concluded that he was expressing his personal view which, under the Bill Of Rights, he was entitled to. And to quote McKechnie that "Action before the Judicial Control Authority must be with reference to the conduct of racing or behaviour by licensed persons which goes beyond the expression of criticism or scepticism. We do not consider those boundaries have been crossed." -
Any person covered by the rules isn't it?
-
By Murray Fish · Posted
Either or, someone should frame a book! -
By All The Aces · Posted
I am assuming this relates to licence holders only Thomas. -
By Murray Fish · Posted
So if one makes the effort to get on course then fuck you? <--- yes I can 'attempt' to use my phone to do so! but the fecking thing isn't friendly contrast etc wise!
-
-
Topics
-
