-
Available Subscriptions
Trotting Chat
2,978 topics in this forum
-
- 4 replies
- 93 views
-
- 143 replies
- 11.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 219 views
-
- 5 replies
- 396 views
-
- 43 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 379 views
-
- 10 replies
- 642 views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 183 views
-
- 27 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 6 replies
- 533 views
-
- 0 replies
- 315 views
-
- 30 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 24 replies
- 538 views
-
- 11 replies
- 578 views
-
- 22 replies
- 769 views
-
- 9 replies
- 686 views
-
- 45 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 5 replies
- 522 views
-
- 13 replies
- 828 views
-
- 44 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 70 replies
- 5.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 386 views
-
- 84 replies
- 4.9k views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
huh.i explained why .No point picking out bits Again,that ain't neccassarily so,even probably so. i explained why if you read my whole post. but for you again. if you run x amount of races and those amount of races are not generating enough income from wagering to cover the stakes paid.And then you increase the amount of races from x to y,and you generate the same turnover per race on the y races as you had on the x races,then what you have done is maintained turnover but increased the deficit between turnover and stakes paid,because you have run more of them. you just miss the points i made,i can't help that. -
-
By Murray Fish · Posted
Over the years I have been involved with quite a few IncSoc, set up a few! A standard rule has usually been that 'on ending', any reserves go back into that local community! To me, most tracks started of and grew through there relevance to their local community! Most have had nice relationships with their local councils and have kosher agreements around rates. (read locals have invested in the track..) rave over.. sigh, refer to my post above!! I will share this with you! Over the last few years I have made the effort to speak to various 'committee people' from Tracks that have been label 'gone', just about, and this is still happening, feel that communication around this topic is very flawed! To be Told that they can be sold up and their assists taken strikes deep! Watch the Lawyer$ getting involved when and if certain tracks/clubs get liquidated! ps. by chance! I have a spare Race Course! out Avondale way! 200mil and its yours! got a harbor bridge going cheap to! -
The 3 or 4 presenters for OTG are surely paid employees of Trackside and therefore employees of the NZ TAB. representing OTG they are given preferential treatment by their employer by being allowed to bet on any bet they want and any amount they are allowed to win! Whereas some punters not employed by the TAB are not allowed at all to bet on certain options and restricted to small amounts on other bets!! How on earth is this actually legal despite what is stated in the TAB rules that they do not have to accept peoples bets? It just shows how unethically wrong the way they are operating. They also dont follow the AML legislation limits but they have been getting away with it. -
By Murray Fish · Posted
not sure about the NZ bit... re Au, doesn't that 20th share also have technical tax repercussions re ownerships stuff? (tax right off for...) ps, loved the yarn... we must charge a glass together one day!
-
-
Topics
-
