-
Available Subscriptions
Trotting Chat
3,026 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 312 views
-
- 37 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 36 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 8 replies
- 849 views
-
- 12 replies
- 830 views
-
- 1 reply
- 362 views
-
- 0 replies
- 270 views
-
- 0 replies
- 276 views
-
- 19 replies
- 900 views
-
- 10 replies
- 646 views
-
- 3 replies
- 501 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 253 views
-
- 10 replies
- 539 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 330 views
-
- 11 replies
- 655 views
-
- 4 replies
- 352 views
-
- 103 replies
- 6.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 274 views
-
- 30 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 756 views
-
- 11 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 301 views
-
- 8 replies
- 815 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
It's an Incorporated Society and by law is entitled to manage its own rules. Try again. Do you think Judge Ema Aitken will use BORA as a defence? -
From the report on the Morton case. And the introductory words he used - "came across as" - made it plain he was expressing his personal view which, under the Bill Of Rights, he was entitled to. McKechnie's words from the decision and prior, as Morty has said here. As I said. Try again. -
It certainly does and was in the Morton case. It's not a private company but one performing a "public function, power, or duty conferred or imposed on that person or body by or pursuant to law." Try again.
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
BORA doesn't apply to NZTR as it is an Incorporated Society i.e. self governing. -
or that is otherwise harmful to the reputation or standing to the New Zealand racing industry; So, for example, critical comment that may be harmful to the industry seems to go way beyond the BOR rights' limitations doesn't it? Whether or not they deem it harmful to the industry can not be a Rule of Racing if it conflicts with the BOR. This seems to go way beyond it, so is probably not valid because of that conflict?
-
-
Topics
-
