Happy Sunrise

Don't know Chief, too be honest, I struggle to watch either as it freaks me out.

Did they have a house party instead?

Wow, really? That is interesting for me who didn't know.

Your wallet could carry your punters card and your anti racing members card with a comment like that Brods.

This may be unpopular but I think jumps racing is cruelty. I don't feel the same way towards harness racing as the welfare of horses is high on the agenda and ability of drivers has improved markedly leading to few incidents. I won't be going along to Trentham Gardens but I get their point.

WTF!

umm...behave HTP.

A bonus on harness racing forums sometimes.

1980m might not be long enough.

But no chris?

With a comment like that he must be from Glenmark? Part of the undefeated junior team?

Admirable request but the reality is many don't want to hear the truth as they have already made up their mind. Personally, I don't think anyone involved in the case directly should be commenting on a public forum.

Like Glenmark in its dark days?

But an awful lot has been said in that thread so do you agree with 'the' poster being able to say what they have? Your opinion is not sub judice and it would seem the principle of sub judice does not apply on your other site. I would like to know your own feelings on the appropriateness of the thread itself.

They teamed up at Forbury last week to do well which seems par for the course when they combine. Blair seems to happily drive for this trainer and the trainer seems to want him to drive too. Seems odd that one is supposedly on the defence side of INCA and the other is being portrayed as being a nefarious one on the other side of the fence. Just seems illogical that that the two of them would still be a team. Someone better explain this to me. Someone....please....anyone....

Well, if anyone is good enough to take over from Mark Mac then it is Matt Cross. You can only wish him well. 10 years here is a duty well served and no one could expect him to stay in Chch forever. Sky racing is lucky to have him and I am sure they will appreciate his talent.

if it isn't, then nothing is.

and what is your opinion of the thread in question? Do you support it?

I reckon they are not even sure of that.

Thanks for the advice.

Getting bigger all the time when one party is attacking another in a public forum. Quick way to cause division. Lucky, the sheriff just rode into town and told them to stop it after it was suggested the RIU was acting inappropriately / illegally. That site is a farce.

The irony is the person is not name dropping, it is all 'they' 'everyone' 'them' 'another' 'everyone' to support their damming accusations of an individual on a public forum. And this person wants the industry to shun this particular individual? Is the site owner seriously allowing this public trial of a person to continue? Disgraceful.

That thread has reached a new low along with the site itself. How one person can say that without sanction is appalling. If one of the 'unchosen' RC ones spouted what he is doing all hell would rain down on that person. One should never engage with people like that as they make all the rules to suit themselves and supposedly have an army of (unnamed) supporters behind them. Anybody on RC should consider what is taking place on that forum and ask themselves if they agree with it or not and whether they want to be part of it.

Better than having multiple identities and using them to stir people up on the opposition site ?

You wonder why someone is not telling the interrogator on RC to shut up. Carrying out a witch hunt on a chat site with an investigation going on is just astounding.