barryb

Agreed, I am backing him. perfect distance.

You dont have a philosophy, in fact you dont have a farking clue.

When you do the same and put up some selections each day (before the race) then you can comment, & just for your info as you and your likes are forever banned from that site. I stated well before I posted that there will be very long runs of outs & the current run is not even close to horrendous. Only a fool like you (someone who has never made a bet in there life before the race) would not understand the correlation between price and run of outs. Its incredibly easy to win when you suggest the horse after the race is won. Anyways, energy wasted on a dumbo like you is like farting the against the wind.

The "top class"? Is that code for white ones from USA, UK, Europe & SA, which is where the article was referring too. Just for your info T, as you are a shocker at not understanding what is in front of you. The article states they have expressed an interest, NOT applied to come to NZ. vast difference, but hey what the hell, would hate to spoilt another of your bullshit posts with the facts.

Again another twisted load of bollocks, you certainly are related to Thomass. I only pointed out how stupid your statement was regarding she hasnt raced against any good horses, I pointed out a very good one who has run 2nd to her on more than a few occassions. You are forgetting she only has to beat what lines up against her, which she has done more successfully than any other horse in history. She has not only beaten them but in the vast majority of times she has fair spanked them.

I don't think he ever stepped up. He's a brilliant opposition poli, but has always been a disaster when in govt.

Are you related to Thomass? So a horse that has won over $6m is second rate? & if not for Winx would have won well in excess of $10m.

Last time I looked Hartnell was a fairly decent horse (winning in excess of $6m) & shes beaten him 7 times at various distances in that range. If not for her he would have won well in excess of $10m. Probably would pay to do a smidge of research first before posting.

Generation? Last 100yrs I would have thought. Name 1 who is better.

I doubt he could excel at this either, dribbling bullshit is his strong point.

Chuck them up Mardi, will almost certainly make the fool look even more foolish.

Does it apply to Magpies also Mardi or just Seagulls? Why do I find info on Bird numbers on course? & of course the obvious question is: if wearing blinkers does the bird rule apply?.

Not unless other punters matched your increase which is what Mardi is trying to say.

Ok Newmarket this is my final take on it. rounded for ease of understanding. Barry & NM both place a $1 bet $2 is in the pool, the TAB take 20% of the $2. =40c Barry wins & is paid $1.60 the TAB profit 40c which is totally funded by the loser, NM, as is Barry's 60c profit. Now had Barry not placed a bet. $1 from NM would be in the pool, TAB take is 20% of $1 = 20c, so therefore Barry placing his bet added a further 20c to the TAB profit as the pool size expanded due to his bet. Barry makes 60c profit the TAB makes 40c, NM funds the lot.

Correction there, the TAB makes nothing out of each individual guys pocket, but they do make much more money on Newmarkets bet acitivity. The nature of pari-mutual is the TAB's cut is taken before any divis are paid.

Absolutely NM, trouble is 98% of punters have NO idea if its value or not, they just get on because they think its the best chance to win the race. Best chance to win the race and value ARE NOT the same thing.

Where did I say I earn a living betting?, the number doing that is a tiny fraction of the 2% who consistently win. Heres another question for you, of those who bet, what % do you think keep long term a record of every bet they make? its very close to the 2% above to help you out. Those who don't keep records would be horrified if they did, how much they lost each year & how shitful there punting really is, how little they have learn't over the years & how week in week out they make the same mistakes.

Punters who win are in the minority, like less than 2%, I guess that makes you in the majority. You have to do something different to win Newmarket when the odds are 2%, following the sheeple won’t see you win a thing.

Newmarket Clever punters are those who can exploit a market, regardless of conditions or circumstances.

Mate I am delighted, about it, had 5 bets today, got the winner in the last at $20. Had 4 bets yesterday for 1 winner Anachy at $23. I have 6 bets lined up for tomorrow and again I will find a winner or 2 at great odds. Its a punters paradise NZ, beats looking for $3 favs in Melbourne.

I did a check on the betting and wow its interesting for a 26 start maiden, lets just leave it at that until its been investigated.

I can’t watch it mate, $3 winners galore bores the fark out of me. Surpirsing that a Labour voter like you would want to sit watching rich liberal voting Aussies cheer on seriously expensive drugged up horses is a bit of a shock.

Funny I thought I saw a grey hack win in Sydney at $80's yesterday. That Melbourne racing is so boring mate, $3 favs win constantly, bores me bloody silly. Much more enjoyable being a Wairoa today.

Unfortunately thats all she has done (piss herself), she has sat back and let a multitude of groups do the job she and labour should have done for 9 yrs prior mate. They have proven the most ill prepared Govt in NZ's history.

Its totally staggering isn't it Kopia, & shes rising in the polls. Gives you zero hope for the intelligence of NZers that around 45% of us would be voting for that shit.