Rangatira
-
Posts
5,436 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
66
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Videos of the Month
Major Race Contenders
Blogs
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Rangatira
-
likely to have occurred in confidence
-
Fabrizio
-
barbed wire is most certainly out
-
did arcarno defibrillate
-
i think dizzy quite likes a strong woman -
how would poundy go ?
-
with the horse mentioned in the dismissed charge ?
-
shrug
-
i am not following what you mean, please help me out here what are the differences
-
was that before i responded to the nasty brodster ?
-
are you absolutely certain drop and dismiss are identical outcomes happy ? where does withdraw fit into the equation ?
-
isn't this the darkside
-
they would seems to be the rank outsiders at this stage
-
probably nigel will unless you set up a give a little page
-
sufficiently predictable response i doubt i could have got as much as $1.01
-
NO dropping a charge seems like something the police might do
-
i am not 100% sure what you are getting at here chief usually the crown would present and then the defence and the judge would make his decision based on that i stand to be corrected but a judge can't drop charges but he can dismiss them what i posted was from the stuff article which doesn't support the brodsters version of events. https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/racing/114939089/operation-inca-racefixing-charge-against-canterbury-drivertrainer-dropped
-
Christchurch District Court Judge Raoul Neave dismissed the charge and McGrath was able to walk away. He had no name suppression, but one aspect of the case remains suppressed. Prosecutor Karyn South told the court the Crown believed there was enough evidence but the "public interest test was not met".
-
here you go again inventing your own facts
-
that is clearly not the case lol you just made that up
-
despite the requests made by the Racecourse Inspector to the respondents to provide information emanating from criminal disclosure being deemed both lawful and reasonable by the JCA the RIU are faced with formidable opponents in the form of multiple QC's so i am not sure they meet the threshold for coping
-
arrant nonsense dear old nana jones having used her 3 grand childrens ages in a boxed $1 trifecta that pays $1022.80 will have to identify herself to collect but will not be considered a money launderer by anyone with the smallest amount of commonsense.
-
poor old brodster seldom on the money thesedays hopefully nothing more than a few cups of tea and lie downs are required
-
clearly that is not the case this is quite possibly your best lost plot episode yet
-
could you name the horses then ?
