JJ Flash

Great post- one could argue given BGP losses they were the ideal candidate to use to launch/promote the first F/O Quinellas in NZ. If the bet had lost MM would anyone be raising it - i think we all know the answer Not sure about cross subsidising other punters. Only the TAB bookies could answer that

How come they didn't respond- did they read your constant negativity about them as Its pretty obvious. What question would you like me to ask on your behalf ?? Im happy to put it up under my name if you so desire and its not too stupid

I will do as i please and offer opinions from time to time on here and other forums. They obviously don't suit your agenda on here, I'm a glass half full and trust the team now running NZTAB over your ideas. Thats my choice and given your so big about free speech etc surely you don't want to change that situation or do you? Why do you always respond to posts that are addressed to others??. Are you a control freak- you behave like one at times.

Bizarre comment but your a funny chick with some unfathomable arguments at times but MYA I might go out in sympathy

You struggle, and your not alone, to follow my logic on this is that my interpretation of the business model is a big NO to winning accounts. Restrictions occur globally by all bookies and can be either a reflection of liquidity or a bookie saying no more to a winning account. No business likes to lose money especially when in this case its profits go to pay for stakes that go to those who are putting on the show. Further, how many times have you seen a promotion at say a supermarket where it says - limit 4. Loss leaders never last long As forums are opinion based that's your view of things. I on the other hand quite like his posts. As with all businesses you will never be able to please all your clients all the time.. So this is where your bull shit comes in. if you dont need them why do you constantly go on about them and how unfair they are or restricted you are.??. Its a complete contradiction by you to then say " Brodster certainly doesn't need the NZ TAB!"

Last Year so this the 2nd time he has taken questions. There are some decent questions as usual and some by posters who post on both sites so if you think Huey,Nomates and Leggy to name a few are unintelligent then you are a poor judge IMHO Yes, the rest is pure speculation on your part and i cant answer how the other site got him on board. Good on them for showing initiative as its a very good read. How can you come to that conclusion when you have not seen previous answers from CEO Would i be correct in thinking you either cant or wont post elsewhere, are you restricted?? cos thats what it looks like from the outside

Please get him to post these so called messages- im ok for him to do so- will he do it- i'd be very surprised and it would be selective Its not my issue its Brodie- im not babysitting him like Chief does but then again he does post a lot so its good for his site.As fore me being genuine you have already made up your mind when i read your nonsense/shit about Trojans I don't have the agenda you go on about as that's your domain. Unlike you i dont seek a better reception. I post my opinions. You have been here a short time time and basically took over harness section and have the audacity to call me out. Go for your life- if you don't like what i say or what i post don't read it. That's why i neve respond to HTP as i blocked him 18 months ago. I wil admit to having a bit of fun with you on another site with the welcome to Karrotts thread. I do hope you were not too offended

You really are a plonker, i have no affiliation with any other site or its owners etc. I simply offered the serial bull shitter Brodie an opportunity to ask the CEO his perennial questions which he has gone on about ever since i joined your site.Basil and a few other smart people agree with me from what i have seen. I suspect you have some major long standing issues with another forum. That is your issue not mine

It has everything to do with that. Its you that does not get it. Nobody has said a thing about their losing bets hence my comment about the thread mostly lacking any balance. That's my opinion. naturally you disagree which is what you always do when i post.

From what i have read it looks like a promotion involving a long time losing client. As i have no affiliation with them in any capacity i cant answer for certain. I do notice that the whingers are going on about TAB but has anyone made any comments about BGP losing bets on KM night. For that matter would anybody be posting about it if the quinella had not won?? Sorry for adding some balance

Its not Hesi one but starts with race

Channel X

Play what game- I simply offered the intrepid Brodie a chance to question the CEO of NZTAB re restricted punters etc- thats his fav topic to moan about but its becoming laborious Brodie has failed to respond as usual which shows how serious he isn't. You clearly do not know that Chief withdrew my PM functionality after someone told him i bagged him and his site. I asked him to post this so called slur but im still waiting

The prolific Offshore buyers are not on the grounds to inspect and purchase. Very few NZ agents meet offshore requirements re yearling selection , Mulcaster the obvious exception Very smart business move by Waikato and Westbury to send some stock to MM

Go somewhere else Brodie, there are at least 5 corp bookies in Oz who will quote you and other snipers. As Basil correctly points out the NZTAB does not have to accept anyone's bets if they choose not to. It happens globally - its called Risk Management and assists with providing stakes money for the respective codes. PS. This is for Brodie to respond to if he chooses, not Chief, but he will probably anyway just like most other times.

Im sure Brodie can answer for himself- he doesn't need you to hold his hand or reply as seems to be the case with you whenever i post anything. Brodie, if you do not want to avail yourself of the option i suggested then some might struggle to give you any credence or sympathy for your plight which obviously drives you mad on a daily basis..

There is a Q and A thread on another forum which invites participants to ask the CEO of NZTAB questions. Why don't you try that avenue re pref treatment and punter restrictions

So why not immediately remove such posts. I posted recently about how many posts on here are simply fiction in many instances. Karrots took offence at that The Forbury and Retarded posts substantiate my fiction theory. However its your site and if you want to attract/retain those sort of posters and be known as a haven for such types then good for you.

What i find objectional is the your allowance of his and Retards posts which you seem to think are ok in Forbs case. Your slap on the wrist for the other idiot shows some degree of rationality I take it then you are ok with Forbury's Purdons outburst- why am i surprised???

I have not seen any reply, where would i find it? Just a question for you. Do you agree with any of Forbs post that i found objectional. Also, im sure many people who use moderation function would be objecting about 3rd party posts , as in not about themselves

I used it on 14yr old post where Forb went into one of his outrageous anti Purdon posts. Did you see it😄 More importantly are you going to do anything about it ?

Ive noticed that- for that matter your arrogance prevents you from taken notice of others advice as well. Happy a few others soon found that out.

Every opinion i have is honest Doug, I thought the moderation function was taken away from me along with PM function which you so kindly denied myself and Mehe access to Right on que you reply. FYG i was referring to Forbury's recent outburst about Mark Purdon- is it still around or did you wisely delete it.

Wrong Wayne 😇

Agreed but very low standards on here these days IMHO. Although Forbury wins for the most fiction and hence outrageous posts.