Jonny Longshot

Newmarket you dirty fiend. Ain't no problem with likin' 'em mature and slutty. Own it.

Is this a meeting of the Flat Earth Society?

Pretty sure you will give in before them

Brodie, I think you've hit the point of max lunacy. It used to be fun watching you get on your soapbox. On the TAB's shenanigans you are absolutely right. But in Inca, and now especially on this Sam Thornley issue, you are displaying maximum arrogance and ignorance. When I really feel like it is unjustified. Sending the kid back to the trials was the most suitable thing to do so he can make fundamental changes to his driving and familiarise himself with the rules. He was only driving in Kidz Kartz earlier this year so whoever has fast-tracked him in a matter of months has obviously done so prematurely. In this day and age, there is a heightened awareness around horse welfare and public perception and hitting a horse that many times, so very far over the limit that its not even close, can not be tolerated. I've had enough Brodie for the year. Why don't you go and do some work on your rentals and get off BOAY for a few weeks or months. It's clearly impacting on your ability to reason soundly.

Sue the Police? I'm not sure that's how things work.

Please direct me to any driver who has hit their horse 25 times in 300 metres to win a race in the last two years. This was the right move, and decisively so.

Addington aren't much better with their love affair with 1980m races.

Where have you been Mr Knowitall? He's had horses at the races for nine months now.

I think there was a bird under the table given him some early evening delight.

Who gives a shit who anyone is? Just say your piece and debate like grown ups.

Can you imagine the nicknames he would come up with. THE GENERAL Jimmy Curtin THE QUEEN Sam Ottley THE SILENT ASSASSIN Tim Williams SLICK Rick May RUN RUN Johnny Dunn MARKY BOY Purdon Jason Teaz has already helped him out with THE LONGSHOT PRINCE John Morrison

Correct, but X and Y's lawyers then challenged that ruling through the courts? Not sure how it played out.

You may well find that most unlikely, but you better believe it's true. I would link you to some interesting information available online but it would, ostensibly, breach suppression orders so I can't. And yes, that is why the RIU kept them out of the loop - no faith in the Board to remain impartial. Some members of the board have horses with horsemen embroiled in this so there in itself is a conflict of interest and why HRNZ must stay well away from the matter. Unfortunately, they have tried to do the opposite. In fact, the Chairman came out shortly after the raids and demanded publicly to know why HRNZ were kept in the dark.

Brodie, you are not the judge or jury. And you cannot tell me you have read the hundreds and hundreds of pages of evidence. Most likely you have you heard second hand or even third hand from someone who knows one or more of the charged or one of their close confidantes, and it's been relayed to you that they think it's all a beat up. Which, of course, is what they are always going to say. Of course, it COULD be, but also, it COULD NOT be. And until such time the charges are thrown out of court, and not pursued by the RIU to the JCA, then you need to sit on your hands and stop peddling this agenda as though is is fact. And to answer your questions, if they are found not guilty, or the charges are thrown out, then I would guess the Police or the RIU would be the ones they would pursue for costs. HRNZ have nothing to do with this - trust me. The former CEO and the Chairman both admitted publicly the first they knew of Inca was when told by Police the night before the raids to expect some bad publicity the next day. The irony of your view that HRNZ should be held accountable is that the Chairman and his board support the accused so to blame anything on them is stupid and ridiculous.

HRNZ have nothing to do with this inquiry. At all. On the contrary, they have tried to involve themselves and have been left in the cold by the RIU and Police. Why should they be accountable for lawyers bills?

What a bizzare thing to say.

His new boss has been through a LOT of trainers.

He lives in Hamilton and calls in the South Island.

The horse went 3 wide solo from last at the 800 on Day 1 at Hawera and was beaten a very short margin. Suddenly it can't sprint 500 metres from the 1x1?

Where do you watch it before it goes on TV?

Perhaps you should familiarise with the most recent round of evidence

Inca assessments for one.

Who would buy a horse that has bowed a tendon twice?

Heard the main thing they want is for TAB to not force them to pay six figures for fields/form access per annum. Given any formguide directly boosts TAB turnover, it seems counter-productive to deny them access.

Neither Andrew Morris nor Kevin Smith are married to Stipes. And the RIU have nothing to do with Addington's field selection. Off you go.