curious

AI reinforcement has been going on globally for decades. I've seen it happen in at least 3 jurisdictions. Embryo transplants are another story. Not allowed but what is the harm or big deal?

Trainer H Wynyard admitted a charge of misconduct in that she spoke to a Stipendiary Steward in an inappropriate manner with the Judicial Committee imposing a fine in the amount of $1,200.

What kind of conversation do you have to have with the stipes to cop a $1200 fine? I heard she might have told them to go forth and multiply themselves but even so, $1200?

Nearly a litre???

Are you serious? Shows how much you know or don't know perhaps. I am sure she was also trained in how to use a whip on racehorses.

I'm afraid the whole idea of "scaring" horses or any animal into performing does not sit well with me, whether you do that by noise or pain.

Think that might have been a tongue in cheek comment DB if I'm reading it correctly.

They contradict Thommo's claims. To summarise, the results of this study show that jockeys in more advanced placings at the 400 and 200 m positions before the post in races whip their horses more frequently. To gain the advantageous placings at 400 m positions, no horses were whipped while between the 400 and 200 m positions only half were whipped. On average, they achieved highest speeds when there was no whip use, and the increased whip use was most frequent in fatigued horses. That increased whip use was not associated with significant maintenance of velocity as a predictor of superior race placing at the finish of the race. Further studies with on-board sensors of gait characteristics are required to study responses to whipping in individual horses. The authors conclude that, under an ethical framework that considers costs paid by horses against benefits accrued by humans [11], these data make whipping tired horses in the name of sport very difficult to justify. However, it is worth noting that other ethical frameworks would not condone the practice even if it did, contrary to the findings of this study, cause horses to run faster.

Have you read the papers?

https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2020/11/12/first-conclusive-evidence-horses-hurt-by-whips--whips-don-t-aid-.html

That's an interesting one under NZ law too. ProhibitedAdvertising overseas gambling is prohibited under section 16 of the Gambling Act 2003. An overseas gambling advertisement is any communication that publicises or promotes gambling, or a gambling operator, when that gambling, or operator, is outside New Zealand Does the TAB breach this when promoting gambling on overseas events?

Answer to the first question 1000-1200. Don't know on the second one.

Then it's not the revised whip rule that is the problem is it?

Yes, that would delight me. Always carry a stick when starting horses but only ever use it for a tap on the shoulder to regain attention. Mostly it's just tucked in my boot. Not sure how they'd police that but be great if they could.

Except imo the quality of racing will only improve with this sort of initiative along with the professionalism of riders if the whip use is curtailed in this fashion and painful bullying of horses is removed from the skill arsenal of successful jockeys.

Most around here well know of Jim Lalor.

Peach of a ride.

Even the breeders that support it would benefit from that model because it would be legit black type on catalogue pages rather than a restricted race that most won't give much credence to.

Total waste of industry funds. If they wanted to make the race open to all comers with NZB funding a bonus for sales graduates then fine. That would also allow it to achieve the Group status it would otherwise deserve. Simple really.

Yes. I agree.

Maybe they forgot to put the 7" compacted layer on and just put the loose fill on top of the road?

Other notable signals from a number of trainers to. I think Tony Pike had one at the AW trials and something like 8 a week later at Matamata. Wasn't he a strong advocate for the AWT?

Didn't really need to call ..... Synthetic Surface Gets Thumbs Down in Australia Sponsored by: by Paulick Report Staff | 06.30.2013 | 2:36pm Polytrack Australian taxpayers shelled out $20 million for an artificial surface at Clifford Park in Toowoomba four years ago, and will now be paying $7 million to switch back to grass. The Racing Queensland board pushed for switch to synthetic in hopes it would be easier to manage during droughts, but now officials say the decision is one of many made by the former Labor-aligned board that is now under investigation. Current chief executive Adam Carter says officials believe the surface was put in without proper drainage or layering systems, and have discovered that most documentation related to the surface switch was missing. Fields have dropped 30 percent, and wagering at Clifford has fallen 25 percent in the last two years due to the surface. “Synthetic tracks don't work overseas and in Toowoomba, where the temperature can go from the low digits to 40C, it couldn't work because it would be gluey in the summer and hard as bitumen in the winter,” said trainer Darryl Gollan.

Still think it's mad putting in a polytrack in NZ without a high calibre irrigation system. Time will tell I guess.