Brodie

Plenty in Oz!

I must admit I do go over some things many times, but my perogative to keep pointing out the injustices and silliness that has crept into racing in NZ. You can think that everything is rosie, however just because there are rule changes doesn’t mean they are for the better or fair, and just because the NZ TAB only wants losing punters, doesn’t make it right, Tonka.

Dickhead!

FFS, Ranga, are you deliberately trying to be a pain in the arse! Can not be bothered with you as you are deliberately looking for an argument! Dismissing and dropping to most semi intelligent would be one and the same, but not to you because you just want to be antagonistic! Leave you to it

Exactly, they shouldn’t be charged unless there is sufficient evidence! Who pays for Nigel’s defence costs?

So isn’t the Judge dismissing the charge the same thing as the charge being dropped by the Judge, RANGA!!!!!!!! Not sufficient evidence so charge had to be dropped, he wasn’t found not guilty, the bloody charge was dropped!!!!!

What? It is headlines Ranga!!!!!

Happy, of course you are correct, I have previously stated that people aren’t punting all gotten gains thru the TAB. The rule of laundering at the TAB thru the AML act is $10k yet the TAB wants it to be $1k so they can control punters to determine who is wagering and collecting the pathetic amount of $1k! How many gang members or drug dealing people have you seen in TAB agencies and/or Oncourse? I suggest none and if they are putting large amounts in TAB accounts, then that is easily recognised by the TAB! The AML Act is just smoke and mirrors and being used as an excuse just so that they now have full control of everything!

I see the charge on Nigel McGrath has been dropped, not sufficient evidence. What an absolute balls up and waste of time and bad publicity this has caused!

Tonka, are you sure you got all of them? Forums, are an avenue for ranting or expressing opinion! The fact that you want to just disagree with Brodie on everything even when I am right, is just as tedious as me ranting!! You have absolutely no credibility whatsoever now, when you say that Iraklis is more intelligent than the “voice of reason”.

So you are saying that people who are collecting over $1k from Lotto is also a possible money launderer due to having winning no.s? It is all so blatantly stupid! The TAB Bookmakers accept multiple wagers yesterday at Rangiora on a horse one being 13k at $1.60 and several others on the same horse. The Bookies obviously knew who this punter was and accepted his money! Other punters can not get anything like that amount on and are restricted to under $100 on most occasions and they are classed as possible launderers of money and the $13k punter isn’t!!! Is there anyone apart from Plonker and Ranga that think that this is fair and reasonable?

Bit tough when u drive a perfect race and win and they tell Sam that he is not good enough yet to be driving in tote races. Some of the RIU should go back to school

You are a very wise man Chief

Apologise must be transgender with rose name

Off course it shows that the TAB thinks that someone who has invested $2 and collected $1k could be a money launderer as they have to prove who is collecting that massive sum! Why does the TAB staff need to ask a punter for ID when they clearly are not a launderer just got lucky with a collect. Asking regular punters known to the TAB staff as Not laundering money, but just trying to have a punt for ID every damn time has got nothing to do with money laundering but controlling the bigger punters. Why don’t they follow the rules as defined in the Act which is $10k??????????

Everyone is considered a money launderer Ranga! If you collect over 1k you have to produce ID to identify yourself! What part of that don’t you understand?

Don’t know Sam Thornley at all, but I do know from watching Copperhead Rose, that she only runs well from vigorous urging. Sam was clearly driving from instructions which he followed. Another Win by the horse at Addington, the driver showed the same vigour and was not punished if I recall correctly.

I appreciate Happy that he seriously broke the rule of 10 hits, however to demote him to back to trials is unfairly,. Why haven’t the professional horsemen that have been done for excessive whip had their licenses downgraded to trials as well? Easy kill for the RIU, think he would’ve learnt more by giving him a suspension rather than demotion, as clearly the young man can clearly drive well by winning his first and only drive!!

Cos you got nothing Tonka! You state something just like Ranga and then kick for touch! What did you call me out in regards to the AML Act? You think that everyone should be considered money launderers if they are collecting over $1k???? You have lost the plot if that is your thoughts!!!

What have you called me out on then? I await with baited!!

It did improve heaps with the new trainer Mitchell Kerr, and that wouldn’t have been hard to do bearing in mind the previous trainer Newmarket. You will notice many horses that are going to new young trainers at the moment are going very well fresh up and they go off. Not going to name the trainers but pretty obvious from results. When Arcano won over 1980m at Addington first up you couldn’t have liked it on the way it had been going, but with a young progressive trainer and the money on, it wasn’t that surprising. Was Arcano good enough to race in Canterbury with the previous trainer at this time, No. As I have said Arcano has never really been much cop over anything but a shorter distance.

Yep. Mitch has probably got the best out of the horse first up. Arcano has never been much over anything but the shorter distances as most wins over 2000m or so. Wasnt surprised that he didn’t go that well today as he is an old horse that has never really beaten anything, has been well enough placed and you would think he would be finished now, if Mitch can’t get anymore out of him down here. Still prob competitive at Palmy in a weak race

Na not me! Can not be bothered at the moment! For you Ranga, you haven’t got a damn clue. If you had been subjected to half of what I have endured from the NZ TAB, you would be bitter too. You and Tonka come out with your smart arse comments just because you can! Dont worry I have tried everything to the point that it is not worth the effort anymore. I ain’t producing any ID to the TAB, I ain’t playing there stupid little games and if punters want to do that then that is their right. Dont bother coming back with another smart arse comment!!!

Happy, to be fair it doesn’t take much to shorten the fixed odds. They can now monitor every punter that wants to put a bit on and if there are a series of vets the odds will be slashed. Odds can be halved by next to nothing going on, I can assure you. Thing that you have to laugh at is the TAB seems to be assisting some punters to the point that they seem to be aiding and abetting some punters with money laundering, and yet others can hardly get anything on!! Some of the win bets and amounts that some punters are able to get on is bordering on just chucking money away today!

Ranga, there you go again, just an open ended load of BS! What has someone correctly called me out on???? Go on, Ranga, please explain? You will come back with just another riddle, you are so full of emptiness.