mardigras

That's your self declared world record. I predict I'll make a profit on the Melbourne Cup in 2025. Will that count?

Blinkers on, down in grade - but only when the planets align? Now I see why it's been failing.

I don't get it pete. What's the prediction? That he was going to win on Melbourne Cup day. That he was going to have 4 winners at some point. I'm thinking like you. Is he Thomass' brother?

You seem to be claiming things as 'truth', but I've not seen even what this supposed world record is or what the other things you talk about are. I guess we just believe you and leave it at that. Doesn't fill me with confidence.

Well that's simply a bogus record. And so I'm not sure why you've mentioned it. Here's a tip, it will rain 6 years from today.

You don't do 'Superior Performances', you do 'Superior Class of race'. Sadly they do not correlate with each other. And what you do certainly isn't beyond understanding. It just isn't worth being used.

If you stop being just generally stupid, you wouldn't get the treatment you get. But for you, that is not likely to be possible. Since you're generally stupid.

I've done heaps of critical analysis. Most of it aimed, quite appropriately, at the blue print. How could anyone be anything but critical of that pile of shit.

Mine wasn't a question. It was a statement after all the time you've spent shovelling shit for Messara.

For me, the letter R was the letter of the day. Also as useful as that BP shit.

No wonder he loves the Messara report.

You sure have. And I've put up the matching selections. Thanks Mr 40% loser.

Hilarious. The one guy that uses stats going on about the people like me, that don't use stats. Idiot.

That's odd, cause the winner was 3rd line. Have you not heard of scratchings. Plenty of time to invest. Did you like the first four? Masterclass.

I'm not blind and I don't need to make shit up after the race. Your selections and strategy are clear when you posted them. They result in losing. You don't like that so now you want people taking quinellas multied with trifectas - all because your 4 selections fell short. That's not unusual. The blue print is for morons. It suits you well.

Yep, I don't have the answers. If I did, I'd be able to select the winner of every race in one. I can't. And I don't have the luxury of picking them the next day. As for the BP, it shows 1 winner from 4 selections, paying just over $2. I know that's not bad for you, but I think I'd rather use a dartboard than that.

All assessments are subjective idiot. The main difference between people's assessments is that yours are based on generalisations (i.e. flawed), and astute punters won't use generalisations like your blue print. If you had ever been educated, you would know that it is not possible for the generalisations that you use to work in punting. It has nothing to do with my opinion. They are flawed. The evidence I have put up would make most people realise that even if they don't know why they are flawed - just as you don't know.

Whatever you do, there will be people who find fault in it. It's the nature of internet sites.

Would depend on the punter. For me, yes. For a place punter, no.

Top effort as usual barry!

Cheers Turny - but it's all barry's selections. I'm just adding my prices. barry is a very good judge!

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/information-efficiency-in-financial-and-betting-markets/biases-and-insider-trading-in-exotic-bets-on-thoroughbreds/FDAF90B810DFD24EA5E387EE476B8685

Go for it. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/information-efficiency-in-financial-and-betting-markets/BAF6D626DEBEE0586AB53BCF5E1A996D

No, the most offered was $13 from my info.

I've never met curious in my life. As for my book, do you want to read it?