Mikie

Why is that odd? How would they know how many votes are in the mail, as some States allow mail that is postmarked before a cutoff point If it was NZ Post they could still be getting valid votes in December Mikie

Incorrect Brodie, I would know something about it Stop being a phuckwit and admit when you are wrong You stated that Biden had lost the Election Now tell us, are you still saying that? Mikie

Anyway, back to the original post that I queried Brodie stated that Biden had lost He didn’t state that Biden had won but things don’t add up for Brodie or Trump He stayed as fact that Biden had lost Now Chief, tell us, is that right? Mikie

Holy crap, and you try to say that something else has been taken out of context The above is a pitiful reply to allegations of electoral fraud You have grabbed it’s busty examples when you know full well that the allegation, unproven and obviously untrue, is about widespread organised electoral fraud You’re being a hypocrite Chief Mikie

How the hell can they be out of context? They were standalone tweets that the fool tweeted, how is it possible that they could be out of context? Mikie

FFS Chief, the "mob?' Gimme a break Why don't you read Brodie's posts that he gets pulled up on and that he can't substantiate so he twists things to divert attention elsewhere rather than leaping to his defence just because it's Brodie ie read what he posts and what others are asking Anyway I don't think 3 posters can be called a mob, they would be a triumvirate 4 posters would be a quartet I guess 5 posters could be called a mob but that would mean 5 posters not counting Mehe, because you said he joined the "mob" You are exaggerating Mikie

OK Chief Here's 3 things that Trump has stated. Go for it 1. "The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make US manufacturing non-competitive" 2. "New environment friendly lightbulbs can cause cancer" 3. "Wind turbines cause noise-induced cancer" Mikie

Yes, you are being pedantic Funny, that's what you accuse me of whenever I pull Brodie up on an incorrect statement he has made and he dodges replying to the question and instead posts drivel on a tangent I think in this case debating someone's personality faults or otherwise can include their moral character but hey, as you remind me, it's your site Mikie

Not a statement he made but what about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein Sure I wasn't there but I have seen the photos Does that count towards his personality Chief? Mikie

Absolutely nothing Hunter Brodie brought Trump into it on the 39th posting on this Topic so ask him Mikie

You are a nutjob Brodie You dream that people have posted things, why am I deluded? Where on earth did I post in support of Biden? I didn't, the voters had a choice between a bumbling fool and an arrogant bumbling fool Mikie

I'm not 100% certain but I think the limit that is still in place is on multis I think it was $250,000 but now has been increased to $500,000 on any multi bet Haven't done any research, but this sticks in my mind as the case Mikie

You quoted me asking Brodie to substantiate his post, so that's how it was perceived as you helping him out If you wanted to post your assessment there was no need to quote me This is now the 4th time that Brodie has posted something where he is not on the money, he has been clearly wrong 3 times and probably now this 4th time, that's what pisses me and others off He never admits that he is wrong even when he is clearly is, and he twists his next post so that he ducks out of admitting it, classic misdirection really Wouldn't know if he's goodlooking as I don't know who the phuckwit is Brodie should work for Sportsbet, I see they have paid out $23,000,000 on a Biden win If Brodie worked for Sportsbet he could pay out on Trump as well Mikie

FFS, thanks for that Chief But I already knew all that, I watched CNN What I was confused about was Brodie stating that Biden had already lost, as he is always on the money I just assumed that he was privy to matters that no one else knew But thanks again for helping him out of the hole he dug for himself Mikie

Thanks for that, but that’s not what you stated and what I queried You stated that it was great to see Biden lose I am assuming you have knowledge that hasn’t as yet been shown in CNN and am just seeking confirmation Can you just answer the question Mikie

I don’t need to watch CNN today Brodie? You can confirm the result can you? Mikie

If ever the draw has thrown a spanner in the works for a race this is it! Mikie

In respect of the punters who backed those 2 my point exactly Noodlum It's setting a dangerous precedent I would have thought Mikie

"I have got far better things to do than waste my time posting with small minded pedantic people! I will leave it up to the others to post as I am over and out! Enjoy the rest of this difficult year and hope everyone has a great xmas and holiday season! Edited Tuesday at 09:36 PM by Brodie" Remember? Mikie

Oh, I didn't realise that we all had to obey you My mistake You also said yesterday or the day before that you weren't going to post again? Mikie

Your apology is accepted Mikie

Just move on Brodie You seem to have no idea of what you type True, if you backed them and they were checked after the start and weren't late scratchings then you would not be happy However, these 2 were late scratchings so anyone who backed these 2 would be happy Understand? Mikie

Not being smart at all, just can't follow your logic Why is it not great if you backed them? It is a simple question, I thought that someone who backed them would have been depressed to begin with, then happy afterwards Mikie

I give up Brodie You clearly stated "not great if you backed either horse (that was late scratched)" You are wrong, those that backed those 2 horses and got their money back would be happy I'd say Mikie

How could it be not great if you had backed them? Wouldn't it actually be great if you had backed them? You got your money back Mikie