Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Michael Guerin


Forbury

Recommended Posts

Michael Guerin has shown his talent again like FFA show day in November with his five short price losers.tonight he got one home that fell in at 1.80 with the other 4  short price favourites all losing.hes surely talented to be able to pick constantly odds on favourites that lose.Screenshot_20240217_001229.thumb.jpg.4335308be72280510fd69c307fba2667.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Forbury said:

Michael Guerin has shown his talent again like FFA show day in November with his five short price losers.tonight he got one home that fell in at 1.80 with the other 4  short price favourites all losing.hes surely talented to be able to pick constantly odds on favourites that lose.Screenshot_20240217_001229.thumb.jpg.4335308be72280510fd69c307fba2667.jpg

Tipping short priced favorites seems  to be the way tipsters go these days.

I always believe those who do the tipping should state what they think is a fair price as well when tipping a horse.

And backing several short priced favorites iin one night in my opiniion is not the way to make much money. You either win,but not much,or lose but not much.

I never had a bet at aucklnad,but who would have picked mach shard to beat self assured. On form that had to be impossible to predict. 

And i watched All Cashed Up closely as i thought it looked the bet of the night,it was actually paying a good price for what seemed a sitter.

I just watched it hoping it didn't win,like you do when you have no money on.

Well i thought she couldn't have driven it any better if you were wanting it to get beaten. It was one of those races where you watch and think ,why on earth doesn't she just move up a bit closer,when they were going so slow? You could see the race slipping from her grasp like a slow movie,and sure enough it did. But that happens sometimes.You can pick the horse who looks a winner,but they don't always win.

Edited by the galah
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, the galah said:

Tipping short priced favorites seems  to be the way tipsters go these days.

I always believe those who do the tipping should state what they think is a fair price as well when tipping a horse.

And backing several short priced favorites iin one night in my opiniion is not the way to make much money. You either win,but not much,or lose but not much.

I never had a bet at aucklnad,but who would have picked mach shard to beat self assured. On form that had to be impossible to predict. 

And i watched All Cashed Up closely as i thought it looked the bet of the night,it was actually paying a good price for what seemed a sitter.

I just watched it hoping it didn't win,like you do when you have no money on.

Well i thought she couldn't have driven it any better if you were wanting it to get beaten. It was one of those races where you watch and think ,why on earth doesn't she just move up a bit closer,when they were going so slow? You could see the race slipping from her grasp like a slow movie,and sure enough it did. But that happens sometimes.You can pick the horse who looks a winner,but they don't always win.

I also found the drive on All Cashed Up late in the race a bit puzzling. Crystal drove the horse quiet and pretty. Was going beautifully at the 400 but didn't move.  Only really asked the horse for an effort at the 75 metre mark when not close enough to win. Horse finished faster than every other runner in the race. Watching thousands of races over many decades confirmed to me the horse still had plenty left in the tank. With a degree of confidence, I feel if Crystal had asked for an authentic effort earlier in the home straight, All Cashed Up would have at least run second.

My judgement was either All Cashed Up was at risk of blowing to bits so the driver was keeping the horse from losing it.....or there is a more important target on the horizon...aka "managing the horse"

Interestingly, nothing was said about the drive but David Butcher with the runner up Liaison was questioned over his lack of vigour in the home straight. To my eye, his drive was consistent with the way David drives and several other factors which he explained to the stewards. 

All Cashed Up on the other hand was fav and the question should have at least been asked.

My conclusion. I've either forgotten how to read races .....or the Stewards were too busy focusing on Butcher on Liaison to even notice All Cashed Up. 

I speak via observation rather than pocket. I had one wager on the night. Chase The Dream 

 

https://harness.hrnz.co.nz/gws/ws/r/infohorsews/wsd06x?Arg=hrnzg-Ptype&Arg=RaceVideo&Arg=hrnzg-RacehdrID&Arg=7C9F0B39-13B6-4DE9-B282-D75E6685551A&Arg=hrnzg-rSite&Arg=TRUE

Edited by Walt
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The great leveller is HANDICAP racing . designed in history to give em' All a Chance.

As Walt tipped at Marlborough Cup last month , Mossdale Ben as a special. Went a great race too, But 4th was his lot off 30m. going 3 seconds faster than those off the front is a HUGE Ask. 

Auckland did it very well last night. Applied Handicaps to put the better horses back a bit so all had a chance.  Mach Shards 10m start enough to beat self Assured. 

JASINOVA in the feature trot . buzzing along for Dr Chin for a great win off the front , had enough start with the Handicap to hold out good trotters like Sacred Mountain (35m) and Sunny's Sister the recent trotting Derby winner was struggling to get into it.(off 25m)  A great leveller !!

All Cashed up couldn't bridge the Gap either . you have to trot 2 and 1/2 seconds faster than those off the front to win these sort of races off handicaps like that.

Sundee's Son was gifted Rowe Cups and Dominions 'Off The Front' before retiring recently. 

A real shame as that took the Thrill and Leveller of the Handicap out of it. .

Copy That with same advantage to win a non-handicapped 2nd Nz Cup too. 

  • Like 1
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can Gammalite please explain to me why the top races in harness racing need to be Handicaps, whilst Usain Bolt was never handicapped at the Olympics?

It can't be the betting angle as you can bet on the Olympics

Edited by Michael
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Michael said:

Can Gammalite please explain to me why the top races in harness racing need to be Handicaps, whilst Usain Bolt was never handicapped at the Olympics?

It can't be the betting angle as you can bet on the Olympics

Competitive racing mate . Easiest answer yet.

Champions of all time were put off handicaps So all runners have some chance to win.

If Cardigan Bay and Lordship were always off the front they probably would never of been beaten. 

in modern times what have you seen happen ?

Fields have dropped away mate. Won't be long to the NZ CUp won't have a full field at this rate. 

 Mach Shard and other good horses like that had extended Australian campaigns because they can't beat Copy That off the front for example . Many Nz owners just sell them as can't beat Allstars off the front (and lately brother Barry) The Fields there have got Smaller and Smaller as No-one will Bother to take them On. Butt's race horses in WA currently . to be competitive.

even leading Trainer DUNN's are struggling ? with pacers . But of course had the No handicap Bonus wins with Sundee's Son in the trotting races recently . The opponents were No Chance . 

PRIME EXAMPLE for Michael >>>>>>Not long ago Mark Purdon raced last Years Brilliant Dominion Group 1 Show Day winner Oscar Benanova off a 30m handicap in a support race on Dominion Day. He knew he COULD NOT BEAT Sundee's Son off the front in the Big race on the day . Mark Won the Handicap race ok. A competitive Trainer who looks after his horses.  (and now winning the Dominion himself with OscarB now Sundee retired )  

Dunn's more likely to put their pacers in Midclass Handicap races nowadays , around the provincial circuit Cups and that. Marlborough Nelson and that  . They're Still Run as Handicaps .  For Competitive racing . 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goowin is a tool. I don't listen to any tipsters.  However I do listen to people  who work in stables.  Example,  a trainer I was at workouts with had two horses in same heat. My horse had a white  blaze and the other one didn't. I noticed they had swapped saddle numbers.  I asked why,  trainer said we don't want her starting favourite next start. My horse won easily but anyone at the track only remembered the winner.  The staff all knew ours was kept quiet. 

 

Hj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Gammalite said:

Competitive racing mate . Easiest answer yet.

Champions of all time were put off handicaps So all runners have some chance to win.

If Cardigan Bay and Lordship were always off the front they probably would never of been beaten. 

in modern times what have you seen happen ?

Fields have dropped away mate. Won't be long to the NZ CUp won't have a full field at this rate. 

 Mach Shard and other good horses like that had extended Australian campaigns because they can't beat Copy That off the front for example . Many Nz owners just sell them as can't beat Allstars off the front (and lately brother Barry) The Fields there have got Smaller and Smaller as No-one will Bother to take them On. Butt's race horses in WA currently . to be competitive.

even leading Trainer DUNN's are struggling ? with pacers . But of course had the No handicap Bonus wins with Sundee's Son in the trotting races recently . The opponents were No Chance . 

PRIME EXAMPLE for Michael >>>>>>Not long ago Mark Purdon raced last Years Brilliant Dominion Group 1 Show Day winner Oscar Benanova off a 30m handicap in a support race on Dominion Day. He knew he COULD NOT BEAT Sundee's Son off the front in the Big race on the day . Mark Won the Handicap race ok. A competitive Trainer who looks after his horses.  (and now winning the Dominion himself with OscarB now Sundee retired )  

Dunn's more likely to put their pacers in Midclass Handicap races nowadays , around the provincial circuit Cups and that. Marlborough Nelson and that  . They're Still Run as Handicaps .  For Competitive racing . 

 

 

You seem to have gone off on a tangent

I never said no Handicap racing

I merely stated that the top races for the best horses should not be Handicaps

Isn't the whole point of a Competition to find the best?

Chief Stipe is just a dickhead who has to disagree so he brings up Usain Bolt's odds

What about Super Rugby?

What about the NRL?

Are their games handicapped?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Michael said:

Chief Stipe is just a dickhead who has to disagree so he brings up Usain Bolt's odds

Didn't you bring it up?

On 20/02/2024 at 12:46 AM, Michael said:

Can Gammalite please explain to me why the top races in harness racing need to be Handicaps, whilst Usain Bolt was never handicapped at the Olympics?

It can't be the betting angle as you can bet on the Olympics

 

5 hours ago, Michael said:

What about Super Rugby?

What about the NRL?

Are their games handicapped?

What about them?  You are not comparing apples with apples.  Neither of those sports rely on wagering for their income. 

There are ample opportunities for the best horses to prove they are the best.  Why not continue to have time honoured Handicap races that provide an attractive wagering event?

Seems to work for the Melbourne Cup!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

Didn't you bring it up?

 

What about them?  You are not comparing apples with apples.  Neither of those sports rely on wagering for their income. 

There are ample opportunities for the best horses to prove they are the best.  Why not continue to have time honoured Handicap races that provide an attractive wagering event?

Seems to work for the Melbourne Cup!!

Sounds or looks like to me that Michael is handicapped.

Only a month or two ago he was bemoaning Invercargill having its Cup at the same time as the so called  Northern top races.

Invercargill race their race then as their are no races in the north over Xmas, New Year, it's 2024, not 1974, times have changed.

You have to have handicaps for some races, it's little wonder less people are bothering when the odds are stacked against you.

There are actually more races for top class horses than we tend to think, many rating 60+ races have a maximum back mark of 30m or so, they have a choice to turn up or not then they have all in FFA, note how those fields attract 6 starters of less, lots just don't bother.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't you bring it up?

No, I didn't bring his odds up, you did. Try to keep up

There are ample opportunities for the best horses to prove they are the best.  Why not continue to have time honoured Handicap races that provide an attractive wagering event?

Seems to work for the Melbourne Cup!!

Poor example, no doubt you want the Cox Plate to be a Handicap event

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds or looks like to me that Michael is handicapped.

Reading your posts over the last 6 months there remains little doubt who is handicapped

Of course I complained about the Invercargill Cup being a waste of money

It was, the ROI was ratshit

You can't seem to grasp the fact that we don't have enough top horses to cater for them the length of NZ

You have to have handicaps for some races

I never said you didn't have to

Classic case of you not reading other's posts and then prattling on

Edited by Michael
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Michael said:

Didn't you bring it up?

No, I didn't bring his odds up, you did. Try to keep up

There are ample opportunities for the best horses to prove they are the best.  Why not continue to have time honoured Handicap races that provide an attractive wagering event?

Seems to work for the Melbourne Cup!!

Poor example, no doubt you want the Cox Plate to be a Handicap event

Are you talking to yourself now?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TAB For Ever said:

Michael , IMO ,is a vastly experienced Harness participant from the Top of the South. 

As a breeder ,trainer , driver, Administrator , Fund raiser he has a lot of knowledge of the Industry's workings.

I'm unsure why the Chief is so grumpy with him !

Lol Michael is not Michael Guerin!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TAB For Ever said:

Michael , IMO ,is a vastly experienced Harness participant from the Top of the South. 

As a breeder ,trainer , driver, Administrator , Fund raiser he has a lot of knowledge of the Industry's workings.

So the issues the industry are facing are his fault?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

So the issues the industry are facing are his fault?

One could possibly look at it from that angle....I prefer the other angle that he helped keep patching up a sick industry and kept it going.

His top of the south area often had someone sitting at the top table of HRNZ so they definitely had imput.

The Industry's issue go back many years and in a small country of like NZ and the attitudinal changes toward gambling , the rising cost of living etc ,etc ,etc etc....all been discussed a zillion tines little wonder foal numbers and the farmers who ran a few horses plus interest in general has slumped !

Recently I researched a couple of those Torle / Torpi horses and there were dozens of them bred .

One...Torni ,had 59 starts for NO placings...the only stakes it won were a $150 for a 4th and $87 for 5th's and a few $35-$40 ones for turning up at NZ Met. Total stakes $532. Resilient folk back then !

Times have changed...of course the Volunteers gone from Admin so Bureaucracy takes a lot of money out but that can't change much .

Selling a bit of land and building a 'slush fund' like the ATC tried and it's Members largely agreed was one way to stop the rot .....that ended badly ,now selling horses to Australia is the thing keeping many afloat as it has for years.

Even Rugby seems to be losing ground , propped up by overseas money and in Cricket the money now with the players ......its a changing world   Chief. 

Even when you  are on the right track , you can still get run over if you don't keep moving !

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TAB For Ever said:

One could possibly look at it from that angle....I prefer the other angle that he helped keep patching up a sick industry and kept it going.

His top of the south area often had someone sitting at the top table of HRNZ so they definitely had imput.

The Industry's issue go back many years and in a small country of like NZ and the attitudinal changes toward gambling , the rising cost of living etc ,etc ,etc etc....all been discussed a zillion tines little wonder foal numbers and the farmers who ran a few horses plus interest in general has slumped !

Recently I researched a couple of those Torle / Torpi horses and there were dozens of them bred .

One...Torni ,had 59 starts for NO placings...the only stakes it won were a $150 for a 4th and $87 for 5th's and a few $35-$40 ones for turning up at NZ Met. Total stakes $532. Resilient folk back then !

Times have changed...of course the Volunteers gone from Admin so Bureaucracy takes a lot of money out but that can't change much .

Selling a bit of land and building a 'slush fund' like the ATC tried and it's Members largely agreed was one way to stop the rot .....that ended badly ,now selling horses to Australia is the thing keeping many afloat as it has for years.

Even Rugby seems to be losing ground , propped up by overseas money and in Cricket the money now with the players ......its a changing world   Chief. 

Even when you  are on the right track , you can still get run over if you don't keep moving !

 

Funny you mention that breed…. I remember a horse called Torpast, put $50 on it to win in the 80s, came from last to win at Forbury paying double figures. Think it won a couple more…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, TAB For Ever said:

One could possibly look at it from that angle....I prefer the other angle that he helped keep patching up a sick industry and kept it going.

By going down the path of propping the industry up with Pokie money?  Instead of making it profitable in its own right.  I guess that's why he doesn't support Handicap racing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...