Enthusiast Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 19 hours ago, aquaman said: I have the utmost respect for the kennel, its more about the dog Barrel Runner. Its clearly not chasing, and in my opinion spoiling races by annoying whoever is leading in its races, yesterday it was Opawa Toddy, but to be fair, Rivalries was just as bad yesterday, both would not pass the leading dog. They are both cheats, that wear blinkers, and have no interest in chasing. Have to agree John, Barrell Runner would be any type of good if it would actually chase rather than race... The amount of ground he took off Opawa Toddy and Rivalries (hmm ??), who are both very fast dogs in their own right was huge, absolutely flew to catch up to them but he should've went past... didnt want a bar of winning. Showed the same against Creme Brulee, should've run past, but wouldn't. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enthusiast Posted October 23, 2019 Share Posted October 23, 2019 19 hours ago, aquaman said: I have the utmost respect for the kennel, its more about the dog Barrel Runner. Its clearly not chasing, and in my opinion spoiling races by annoying whoever is leading in its races, yesterday it was Opawa Toddy, but to be fair, Rivalries was just as bad yesterday, both would not pass the leading dog. They are both cheats, that wear blinkers, and have no interest in chasing. Have to agree John, Barrell Runner would be any type of good if it would actually chase rather than race... The amount of ground he took off Opawa Toddy and Rivalries (hmm ??), who are both very fast dogs in their own right was huge, absolutely flew to catch up to them but he should've went past... didnt want a bar of winning. Showed the same against Creme Brulee, should've run past, but wouldn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted October 29, 2019 Author Share Posted October 29, 2019 (edited) On 22/10/2019 at 4:57 PM, Yankiwi said: More favoritism for the McInerney camp today. This is what it looks like when a race rug is put on a dog with its head through the leg hole. Judicial report: 1) SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT:- Southland GRC - 22 October 2019 - Handler M Seque was cautioned for failing to apply the race rug on OPAL HUNTER in Race 13 in the correct manner. https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13743/stewards-report.aspx Edited October 29, 2019 by Yankiwi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambler Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 That's extremely odd. I have heard of kennel staff getting fined for not picking this infringement up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted October 30, 2019 Author Share Posted October 30, 2019 (edited) Why bother having a rule book? The rule book says this is an offence, so why wasn't the trainer fined? 3) Trainer L Pearce was issued with an official warning pursuant with Rule 44.8 for non-presentation of registration papers for her runners today. https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13744/stewards-report.aspx So why was this trainer issued only a warning, when the rule book clearly says it's an offence? 44.8 (a) A Greyhound shall not be permitted to compete in any Race unless the Certificate of Registration and weight record of the Greyhound identifying the Greyhound and certifying that it is eligible to compete, is produced to the Stewards for the purposes of identification at the time of kennelling (b) Where the certificate of Registration and weight record is not produced the trainer shall be guilty of an offence. The minor infringement table doesn't make allowance for an "official warning". Obviously another favour for a chosen one, from an ex-headquarters stipe! Edited October 30, 2019 by Yankiwi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Yankiwi said: Why bother having a rule book? The rule book says this is an offence, so why wasn't the trainer fined? 3) Trainer L Pearce was issued with an official warning pursuant with Rule 44.8 for non-presentation of registration papers for her runners today. https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13744/stewards-report.aspx So why was this trainer issued only a warning, when the rule book clearly says it's an offence? 44.8 (a) A Greyhound shall not be permitted to compete in any Race unless the Certificate of Registration and weight record of the Greyhound identifying the Greyhound and certifying that it is eligible to compete, is produced to the Stewards for the purposes of identification at the time of kennelling (b) Where the certificate of Registration and weight record is not produced the trainer shall be guilty of an offence. The minor infringement table doesn't make allowance for an "official warning". Obviously another favour for a chosen one, from an ex-headquarters stipe! Your joking about the favour are you not Lanna dosen't make the stipes report much and she dont run down many people yanking And she must of forgot the papers and you want her fined I know they are rules but they havent been breach by her before good job she got just a warning What a egg Edited October 30, 2019 by Mehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted October 30, 2019 Author Share Posted October 30, 2019 Generally, I don't have digs at trainers & that is the case this time. My gripe is with the RIU & some of their stewards with the favourtism they show & their lack of consistency. It seems trainers get fined in the north for the same infraction... It seems another trainer was fined recently in the CD as well. and you probably already guessed it, who were the stewards on 7 August? Yes, the same Steward team, with the same individual officiating, that issued yesterdays official warning. It's probably safe to say a trainer wouldn't leave the paperwork back at their kennel on purpose, to see if they could get away with it or not. So what could have been Mrs. Pearce's compelling reason for not having the paperwork that the Agent/Williams team didn't dream up? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambler Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Stipes need to be consistent. It's kindergarten stuff. Johnny I don't like you. I going to tell your mother you pick your nose. Now Sally I saw you pick your nose. Don't do it again or I will tell your mother Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bettingman Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 (edited) I stand to be corrected guys but I’m pretty sure there was a change to the rule and the stipes can now issue warnings for first offences. Edited October 31, 2019 by Bettingman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 23 hours ago, Mehe said: Your joking about the favour are you not Lanna dosen't make the stipes report much and she dont run down many people yanking And she must of forgot the papers and you want her fined I know they are rules but they havent been breach by her before good job she got just a warning What a egg your kidding she should have been fined she is a proffessional trainer not a dummy ffs its as bad as having a happy birthday lisa cole race seriously Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 2 hours ago, wally said: your kidding she should have been fined she is a proffessional trainer not a dummy ffs its as bad as having a happy birthday lisa cole race seriously Just as well it's not here is another Wally day wally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted October 31, 2019 Author Share Posted October 31, 2019 More inconsistency from last night. 3) Trainer J McCook was issued with a warning after failing to present the papers for GOLDSTAR LIBERTY. https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13745/stewards-report.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 4 hours ago, Yankiwi said: More inconsistency from last night. 3) Trainer J McCook was issued with a warning after failing to present the papers for GOLDSTAR LIBERTY. https://www.grnz.co.nz/catch-the-action/13745/stewards-report.aspx I think it's very consistent same result as lana and I think someone has already said they think the rule had been changed were first offenders get a warning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambler Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Any chance this new rule could be copy and pasted so we are all on the same page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted November 1, 2019 Author Share Posted November 1, 2019 (edited) 34 minutes ago, gambler said: Any chance this new rule could be copy and pasted so we are all on the same page No chance I'm picking. There is no new rule. The rule as written... 44.8 (a) A Greyhound shall not be permitted to compete in any Race unless the Certificate of Registration and weight record of the Greyhound identifying the Greyhound and certifying that it is eligible to compete, is produced to the Stewards for the purposes of identification at the time of kennelling (b) Where the certificate of Registration and weight record is not produced the trainer shall be guilty of an offence. Rule 44.8(b) is listed on the Sixth Schedule (Minor Infringement Table). 62.3 An Offence under these Rules may be classified as a Minor Infringement Offence where: (a) the Offence is a breach of one of the Rules set out in the Sixth Schedule (which shall be an Additional Rule Appended to these Rules); and (b) the person who has committed the Offence has not committed more than two (or such higher number as may be determined by the Steward from time to time in the Steward’s discretion) breaches of that Rule in the period 120 days immediately preceding, and including, the date that the Offence has been committed. So no, no new rule. The same old rules that have been there forever. Therefore, if a trainer presents a dog without paperwork, they will have broken GRNZ rule 44.8(b). Rule 44.8(b) is listed on the minor infringement table with a first offence listed as a fine of $50 (there is no such thing as a "warning" or an "official warning", period! (note "official warning" does not appear in the rules anywhere) Anything else the Steward may have taken upon themselves & handed down is two things, Favouritism A Steward acting outside their boundaries. Edited November 1, 2019 by Yankiwi 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 Stop yanking it yanking your a bore 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 And another one today yanking guess what know fine iru are being very consistent with first time offenders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambler Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 That's a highly intelligent comment. Could you please copy and paste this new rule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambler Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 Oh god just read pathetic response on grnz site from riu. Come on yankiwi dob them instead 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambler Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 the cheat on seat shoulda got $3000 fine and put out for 6 months 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted November 2, 2019 Author Share Posted November 2, 2019 Seriously thinking about giving up the fight here. Why bother? I come to this social forum, pick the RIU to pieces over their mistakes, indiscretion, favoritisms, corruption and in return get support from some members who have a IQ greater than the number of digits they have (that's 10 for the dim-twits) only to be personally attacked & have sexual innuendos thrown back at me a childish manner by those same dim-twits. So apparently the Mehe's & the like out there are quite happy with the way the RIU are policing the code & believe the sport will thrive with a continuing complete lack of integrity. Where have I slapped anyone around in the Mehe crowd, the trainers that they support or even the ones they may dislike? Kindergarten is not a place I want to spend my free time. If members can't at least pretend they are grown ups, watch how quickly Yankiwi can vanish. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted November 2, 2019 Author Share Posted November 2, 2019 22 minutes ago, gambler said: Oh god just read pathetic response on grnz site from riu. Come on yankiwi dob them instead INCA have been approached. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambler Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 Why the hell hasn't the blonde sex machine from may hounds been brought into line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gambler Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 (edited) don't desert us yankiwi because of some nobody . There true colors have shone through. One nobody with 2 pathetic supporters Edited November 2, 2019 by gambler Spelling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted November 2, 2019 Share Posted November 2, 2019 What a pack of dick head yanking all you do is wank on you go on about dogs being cheats now it's about trainers not turning up with there papers you go on about dogs being cheats we have all had them shot happens if a trainer gets away with it good Maybe you should start going on about the state of the tracks around the country Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.