-
Available Subscriptions
Dog Chat
529 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 128 views
-
- 4 replies
- 291 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 278 views
-
- 0 replies
- 236 views
-
- 1 reply
- 221 views
-
- 0 replies
- 134 views
-
- 0 replies
- 310 views
-
- 1 reply
- 421 views
-
- 0 replies
- 481 views
-
- 0 replies
- 432 views
-
- 2 replies
- 949 views
-
- 2 replies
- 682 views
-
- 15 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 594 views
-
- 0 replies
- 641 views
-
- 0 replies
- 647 views
-
- 1 reply
- 933 views
-
- 105 replies
- 14.4k views
-
- 59 replies
- 8.3k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 14 replies
- 2.1k views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You didn't look at the second metric - yes equal on wins but 10 less runners as of 9 December 2025. -
Zero evidence why SOS & Noverre are bargain buys but that doesn't stop you. -
He is actually equal with Wooton Basset , but ill give you that one. Very nice horses the Hello Youmzains.
-
you seem confused, as haven't you just said 2 contradictory things. bedsides,Isn't the most relevant thing whether race meetings are generating profits or losses. Turnovers are a good indicator,but turnovers can be down but still generating profits and turnovers can be up but still generating losses.And doesn't it matter most these days just how profitable,or not,the ff betting is per meeting.. Obviously its all a big picture thing in the end,but their doesn't seem much transparency about the big picture.Thats the point i try to make,when i talk about the need for context.
-
-
Topics
-
