I realise this is a little bit off topic, however can anyone answer this? If a horse-say-wins a trial or two impressively, and as the owner you haven't said to anyone that its for sale...lets say an agent approaches the trainer, says ' I've got a client who'd buy that horse'..
OK lets say you tell the trainer you'll sell for..$$$....and the deal is done...with the proviso that you as owner are not the agents 'client'..
1. Your'e up for 10% to the trainer ( and quite rightly so)
2. The agent will probably think your'e going to sling him 10%..
My point is-the agent is acting for his own client who will be paying him to source horse/s...so why would the owner of the horse entertain any claim from the agent? And there's every chance that the agent will flick it on to his 'client' anyway ( if there ever was one) and clip the ticket again..
3. My opinion is-and these deals seem pretty loose-I would tell the agent to get stuffed-your'e not acting for me, and you never were... there's a certain amount of 'pressure'....read 'blackmail' involved in some of these deals from what I hear..
Love to hear any opinions on this.