Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Complete without any downtime ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Taku Umanga

Members
  • Posts

    321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Taku Umanga

  1. Doesn't look like they tested the whole field, so guess he must have been missed.
  2. Yep - where is the consistency ...... there must be a couple of drivers asking that question?
  3. If that's the case, Cambridge needs regular racing - not the once or twice a month meeting that happens now.
  4. HRNZ has the same power ..... and the same lack of gonads when dealing with the race-fixing accused!
  5. It's a kick in the teeth to those lower rated horses that have helped ATC out for so long by making up the numbers - to now say we don't want you because you're not in a "premier" rating band is pretty harsh. No doubt the carrot will be dangled again over the winter months when those "premier" horses are nowhere to be seen.
  6. Hi owners/trainers, This is an update from the ATC regarding the recent stakes increases and the effects these will have on field selection going forward into the foreseeable future. The ATC has put in place numerous ventures in recent times to ensure the viability of the ATC and racing here at Alexandra Park and it is our commitment to our members, supporters and the wider industry that everything is done to enable us to remain as the premier harness racing venue here in the North Island. As with many new building developments in Auckland at this present time, periodic issues have stalled the flow of timely construction and unfortunately for the ATC, this has been no different. The new increased stakes that came into effect as of March 1 2019 was originally meant to have coincided with the opening of both Building A & B and a fully functioning village – however due to numerous issues experienced to date on the building site, completion has now been deferred to an expected September 2019 date TBC. The ATC Board understood how important these new stakes increases were for many in the industry to provide a level of confidence proceeding forward into the future and as a result, the decision was made not to defer these stakes increases until the village opened and to continue with the promised March 1 2019 date for these to kick into effect. What this has meant of the industry is that the ATC now has a $15K minimum stake (2YO’s & non-winners), race winners are racing for $20K and the highest rated pacers/trotters are regularly racing for $25K – stakes levels that are above and beyond any other racing club in the country and allow both owners & trainers to achieve and sustain a far greater potential return than has otherwise been seen for many years in this industry. What we have experienced in recent weeks is the flow-on effect from these increases – with a wealth of nominations for both the meetings of April 5 & 12 and unfortunately (due to limited funding from HRNZ) some horses have had to miss a start. Given the ATC races 41 times for the 2018/19 seasons and hopes to replicate that for the upcoming 2019/20 season, outside of the six Premier meetings there are 35 remaining standard race nights in which most horses are always catered for – again well over and above the number of racing opportunities that are being offered to the industry by the balance of clubs. What has come to light in recent times is that many are not made aware that the ATC is bulk funded at the beginning of the season by HRNZ and this is based on the number of approved meeting/race number licences given to us by HRNZ and the NZRB. For the ATC to achieve the new increased stakes levels of March 1 2019, all available funds (until the completion of the village) have gone into achieving these and hence the ATC is unable to additionally self-fund any extra races here at The Park. HRNZ are in a similar predicament at this current time – having exhausted their own cash reserves which again does not allow for them at this current point to confirm reimbursement to clubs for any additional races that are approved. Both above points are why on April 5 & 12, even given the wealth of nominations, that additional races were not able to be programmed over and above the pre-approved (and funded) race licences for each of these meetings (besides from the additional 10th race that was approved and self-funded by the ATC for $10K this Friday 12 April). Going forward, the ATC wanted to advise owners/trainers on the process of how fields will be selected going forward into the foreseeable future so that while disappointment for some may not be avoidable on a given week, a clearer and more open picture of what can be expected could be instated. The ATC is committed to being the premier harness racing venue in the North Island as aforementioned and this combined with a strong Cambridge & Manawatu will allow for the foreseeability of harness racing in the North for many years to come. What this will mean is that our fields will always be selected from the top downwards, with selection preference (where applicable) always going to those rated R55 & faster on any given week – with the spread of horses gaining preference in any given race to be chosen (at the club’s discretion) using a combination of both ratings & form. This doesn’t mean that horses rated below R55 won’t be given racing opportunities here at The Park on a regular enough basis - series such the ‘South Of The Bombay’s’ will continue to be programmed (again where applicable to the overall racing population) as will races for the R40-54 grade horse. What this will mean though is that Cambridge & Manawatu will derive direct benefit as horses will have to race at these tracks to incur rating points that will allow them to safely guarantee themselves a start here at The Park on a more regular basis than previously – something that while may not please everyone right now, will actually be to the overall benefit of all three North Island clubs and most importantly the industry in the North as a collective. We thank you for your time and understanding during this period and we look forward to having you racing your horses here at The Park not only now but for many years to come.
  7. Please tell me I'm not the only bloke that feels like punching someone?
  8. Under the Racing Act the RIU has the ability to prohibit people from attending race meetings, but they are probably "gun-shy" after the JCA overturned their decision to do so with the Inca accused.
  9. http://www.jca.org.nz/non-race-day-hearings/non-raceday-inquiry-riu-v-g-dixon-reserved-written-decision-dated-22-march-2019-chair-prof-g-hall
  10. 1. No - owners would have got nothing 2. No - driver still gets paid 3. IDK 4. Response redacted
  11. Triumph Herald - man that was a long time ago!
  12. Agree totally
  13. Beaten or not, would your attitude be different if the checked horse hit the deck and was injured / killed or worse if it's driver suffered a similar fate? Careless driving is careless driving surely? Not too long ago at Addington she crossed a horse too early and punctured her own carts tyre and got no penalty - at the same meeting a junior driver shifted out and punctured another sulky's tyre ..... pretty sure he was stood down for 3 days. How can different rules for different drivers be justified?
  14. I thought she was already on holiday but apparently not?
  15. What's he tweeting about here? Wowee. Flabergasted by a decision emanating from the top table this week. Major conflicts of interest at play. And I’m unable to report on it
  16. Works for AGH
  17. Yes - has been going great in his first season as an open driver.
  18. Yep - I think it's only the little fella that pays full service fees .... and there are usually discounts for 2 or more mares to the same stallion.
  19. I recall a galloper (I think) called Vanessa The Undresser
  20. Ran out of ime to edit ...... Ran out of time to edit ..... I'm saying that next time they are required to sign a licence application that perhaps HRNZ should consider that since they have clearly failed to comply with a rule (supplying the information requested - there is no denying that they wouldn't) in this instance, what faith should be put in any declaration to comply in the future?
  21. I think we will all be watching to see what transpires.
  22. I'm saying it will be next time they are required to sign
  23. How are the RIU supposed to do their job if they do not have tools to enforce the rules - hand it over to an authority that has the access to those tools .... seems common sense to me. Are you saying that the RIU should just shrug their shoulders when licence holders refuse to follow the rules they accepted at the time they were licenced? Perhaps HRNZ should take note of X and Y refusing the request of the racing inspector and refuse to re-licence them in the new season since they will clearly be signing a false declaration that they will comply with the rules.
  24. The Racing Act requires the RIU to protect the integrity of the industry. It's not uncommon to undergo scrutiny by two jurisdictions - can even be found not guilty under one and guilty under another ..... O J Simpson springs to mind.
×
×
  • Create New...