That Nortern Southland Cup is a prime example of poor planning, there would be more starters possibly if some horses weren't dropping back too quickly, but why have rating 50s starting in a rating 65+, seems to me it would be smarter if it was a rating 50 +, thus resulting in the rating 70s starting off 30 or 40 meters, which in many ways is the way it was many moons ago,this present system is not working.
Maybe all winners are exempt from a ratings drop for 6 starts after, genuine strugglers need some reduction, another anomaly is 6 horse non winners at Otaki get penalized the same as winning a 14 horse race at Methven, that seems weird.
They could also cap the top rating at 90 or 85 or maybe even cap the drop to 45 leaving all non winners at 40, their are plenty of numbers in the lower grades but many of the main races are just being contrived.
Nice work if you have a handy one, good money to be had, but it's only working for a few.
It's also creating poor races for creating turnover.which is not yielding what's required to maintain stakes