Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Brodie

Members
  • Posts

    6,617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    171

Everything posted by Brodie

  1. The point is that the paid starter said that he was happy with the position of all the runners! The starter effed up and it was not a fair start! If a driver or trainer does something wrong they are very often fined or Suspended! Clearly it doesnt matter what HRNZ employees do, they are are above reproach Apparently. Dont tell the starter that he is not up to scratch! Blame the drivers and now we can fine them as they were the ones at fault!! Watch this space, the continuation of effed up starts will continue and we should get rid of them, certainly the sprints!!!!!!
  2. It is out!! The enquiry into the start has been reviewed and you can read it in the stewards report to todays racing. Very verbose and actually good to see that they admit that it was not good enough! On that basis why was jt not declared a no race? There was error on everyones part, starter, starters assistants and drivers apparently!!!! Who was it that yelled HAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPYYYYYYYYY?
  3. Yes it is debateable, however the starter shouldve seen that the no. 1 horse was well out of position and with his assistant hindering it from coming forward, and let them go And yet the next stand, an experienced pacers race, he took his time and reset it when a horse was playing up? The only consistency we get week in and out, is that we know the starter will be inconsistent!
  4. One of the starters assistants was annoying it and was in front of it with his hand in front of her face! Wasnt given a fair start if u watch the replay Happy Assistant certainly did not think the tape was going to go Ditch the stands altogether
  5. So does this set a precedent for all future standing starts? If horses arent ready we let them go?
  6. Totally agree the horse played a major part in it, however it was not given a fair start due to being out of its right position! Ditch the stands like most tracks have, if they arent fair
  7. Of course it is Ranga! The cracked record is due to unfair treatment of punters in NZ! Seem you have contacts, get them to treat all punters in NZ fairly, before they go into oblivion! All they are doing is driving punters away from racing
  8. Was a 2000m stand, not 200m stand lol
  9. Ranga, I do not associate or am assisted by any unrestricted punters!!! Why is Brodie restricted to amounts that make it not worth investing? The truth of the matter is that some punters have vendettas against them by the NZ TAB!
  10. Sugar n Spice drew 1 in race 5 at Addington over the proverbial 2000m stand! It was a certainty beaten, as the starter yelled out Riight, when Sugar and Spice was standing many lengths back from its designated starting point! It produced a massive run to hit the front and finish just out of the dividend bearing places. If it hadve been allowed a fair start, it wouldve won!! Hopefully today will be the day that the Stewards announce their report into The race 9 shambles of two weeks ago! Should make good reading!
  11. Ranga, what are you meaning by that? So you are saying it is ok for the TAB to restrict people to netting 2-$300 becajse they associate with someone? Restriction limits have been lowered more and more. What I am seeing is that the TAB is driving turnover down on harness racing both on fixed and tote. Looking at the tote pools today, they are very small and if this continues there is no way stakes will be maintained! The NZ TAB have lost the plot totally and will go into administration in time, as there is not going to be any more bailing out from a left wing government!
  12. Where do you bet that from Ranga? So you are saying That no one is restricted anymore? So these previously restricted punters that arent now is because of what? How do you know this? Can you have a word in the Bookies ear??
  13. So punters that have never been restricted are still able to place bets that will net them in excess of say$500 with no problem? If that is the case why are some restricted to two or three hundred????
  14. Does anyone know if the NZ TAB has placed a limit of how much You can net now? Happy has not been able to place what he has wanted Recently, and I am wondering now on this basis, has everyone now been RESTRICTED on their accounts????? What I do know is that the restrictions on account now is at a level, that just doesnt make it worth the effort!!!!! Only being able to place bets where you can only net a few hundred to me is just absolute BS!!!!! Even after they slash the odds, you can not get back on again!! They call themselves Bookies, I would call them something else! Are their punters who nave previously been able to place bets to their hearts desire, and now find that they have to reduce what they can win to bugger all? If this is widespread now that the NZ TAB arent prepared to accept our bets, we should boycott them for a few weeks, to make them take note that this is BS!!!!!!! Interesting to hear your stories!
  15. Mikie, you know a helluva lot more about funding and payouts than I will ever care about! My point is that Mr Holden should be going into bat as much as possible for harness!!
  16. Ranga, the Stewards said that they had opened up an enquiry into the start of race 9 standing start on 9/8/2020 due to the fact that it was not an acceptable standard! That was 2 weeks ago Ranga, and we have not heard a thing since !! Incompetence is clearly acceptable from HRNZ employees but an amateur or Junior gets hammered?? Ranga, we wait with baited breath to see what absolute BS comes out or they may bring out nothing! Very transparent!
  17. Maybe not Mikie! However, Mr Holden acceptance of it, shows just how vulnerable harness is, if our new temporary/permanent CEO is prepared to fold! Harness needs a leader and not someone who is just filling a seat one day a week! What action is taking place to ensure that racing continues?
  18. Ranga, lf course Imam always on the money! Where is the enquiry report?
  19. Being based near the Petone TAB hasnt helped harness getting any favours from it! Pathetic effort in accepting the TAB paying out in arrears! Heez harness is so lucky to nave such a skilled negotiator
  20. Still we hear nothing in regards to the ridiculous standing start to race 9 on 9/8/2020!!!! HRNZ have not announced the result of this so called enquiry that was opened up on it, was this just BS???? Of course it is BS, as there is no need to have integrity if you are employed by certain members of the RIU!!!! CoMe on Mr Holden, you are now the permanent CEO of HRNZ, so seem you think you can do the job, come down hard on the starter, and show us all why you have the confidence of the HRNZ! We will take it that you Are not up to the position if we dont see any action!!!!!
  21. Certainly very confusing as to what on earth is going on? HRNZ are very confident in Mr Holden’s ability and yet they are going to advertise the position and get someone else? So if you are so confident in his ability then why are you Looking for someone else? This is surely saying that Mr Holden is not what we we require? Very confusing isn’t it?
  22. Wow!!! The TAB have taken a couple of $500 bets on Fabrizio @$2!!!!!!!! Geez, they reckon these bets are worth mentioning on Trackside??? What a major risk they are taking!!!! They have thrown caution to the wind arent they?? Well done Bookies, way to go you risk takers!
  23. What is the yes and what is the no?
  24. Why on earth does the TAB have head to heads for gallops both NZ and overseas, and yet we dont get any on harness? Headies on gallops from Gore and even Bendigo in Oz! This Winsurance that they are running appears to be a load of crock, and would be interesting to see how much harness punters are actually Wagering on it? What I would suggest the TAB actually does, is talk to punters as to what they want to wager on! Mr Phil Holden as the CEO of HRNZ needs to go into bat for harness before the industry goes into oblivion!
  25. So we don’t have a right to any privacy Ranga? So someone buys a Product with cash, and the supplier always gets a name of who they supplied to? So, the TAB don’t care who the customer is if the punter is only small time but should they want to win more than $1k, we can not have that, without knowing who they are! They could be money launderers even though they have only spent $20!!!!! The fact is Ranga, when the TAB is limiting punters to only net $200 on a bet, they are killing the industry big time. If they werent bailed out by the NZ taxpayer they would all be out of a job!
×
×
  • Create New...