Yes, that is largely correct. We had a meeting several years ago, to discuss the possibility of an AWT at Riccarton to 'bring us forward into the 21st century ' .
There were several attendees from other Canterbury clubs, and it was made quite clear by the Chair [ Tim Mills ] that meetings would be need to be transferred to the AWT to 'justify the investment ' into that track. I can't understand why those same clubs now don't understand, or are surprised, that their contribution has been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, reduced significantly. We can see now the 'manipulation of programmes' referred to by Huey to incentivise the use of said track.
The only exception seems to be Ashburton, intended to be the 'back up ' for Riccarton, when the expected influx of trainers arrives. Those who can't afford to purchase and live in ChCh, can go to Ashburton, was the idea. I found that concept offensive, but maybe I'm just picky.
I have never been against the provision of an alternative surface, for racing or training. As said before, it will suit some, not others. But it shouldn't be the ONLY option for either.
A senior trainer and former Board member, at that meeting, said to me - oh well, there isn't the bloody money for this fairy tale, if we just hold our hands up in support, he'll shut up and we can go home.
And then along came Winston and the PGF and the rest - as they say - is history.