Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

Yeah - AllStars 100% wins!,,


Brodie

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, JJ Flash said:

Might you accept that these days the big punters who love short priced favs contribute most of the turnover and are thus inclined to bet larger ammounts.

 

Greg

Only if they are losing punters Greg.

Good punters are now restricted to amounts not worth the effort.

New punters in their 20s are not being attracted to racing, they will be into the sports.

TAB is killing off the racing punter, end of storey.

Personally haven’t had a bet since the blatantly dishonest AML rule that the NZ TAB brought in,just not worth the effort for diddly squat.

Overseas in Europe at the moment and enjoying the break.

NZ has great living conditions in comparison apart from the NZ TAB!

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

Some numbers and the odd reason. Interesting the drop in sports betting.

image.png.244356007c31d3c978dee45d1d3ab268.png

image.png.448e6e24651a769762abcafd9af0bdb0.png

Brilliant,  lower betting activity from some high value customers!!  

FFS,  NZ TAB, who are your high value customers?

Is it your bigger losing customers or your previous bigger winning punters?

Are you really that stupid that you can not work out why the turnover has dropped?

You are as honest as this current Government that we have!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Seriously who in their right mind would try and launder money through the NZ TAB?

Correct Chief.

The 1k is just blatant BS, and just another way of selecting who the NZ TAB want wagering with them.

There is no sense of fair play with them whatsoever, and the ones that are making the business decisions are out of their depth!

It is all about yield for the bosses to the detriment of turnover.

Reality is that they will get reduced turnover and reduced punters betting with them and with no new people coming on board and existing ones moving on, it isn’t going to be a positive result!

$1k from a win is money laundering?

Get real and come out and tell all the punters that it is just another way of having total control over everyone!!!!

Does the Casino have a $1k limit? No!

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Brodie said:

Reduced turnover!!!

If you are in Oz you can not bet on NZ racing from your IPad or computer.

Currently in Budapest, Hungary and you can!

Why on earth is this allowed to happen with our neighbour?????!

oz likely to be as a result of the interactive gambling amendment bill of 2016

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Rangatira said:

oz likely to be as a result of the interactive gambling amendment bill of 2016

Seriously we are meant to have close economic ties to Oz and yet we can’t bet on our nZ account for Oz unless it is on our phone.

Another blatantly stupid thing that the powers at be in NZ TAB should be able To sort.

They wonder why turnover isn’t growing, you are kidding aren’t you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Brodie said:

Personally haven’t had a bet since the blatantly dishonest AML rule that the NZ TAB brought in,just not worth the effort for diddly squat.

Do you think your constant attacks on here vis a vis NZTAB have achieved anything tangible. Do they even know who Brodie is?? For the record i have no problem with people protesting or striking for  that matter so i do admire your consistency

 

Greg

Edited by JJ Flash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, JJ Flash said:

Do you think your constant attacks on here vis a vis NZTAB have achieved anything tangible. Do they even know who Brodie is?? For the record i have no problem with people protesting or striking for  that matter so i do admire your consistency

 

Greg

Don’t know and don’t care Greg!

Truth is that the TAB treats punters totally unequal and that is my gripe!

They are supposedly a betting agency that should be taking the good with the bad!

The fact is that the TAB won’t let anyone win consistently and they just make things impossible so that it is not worth your while.

They let some bet $10k and they advertise that they are concerned about losing punters.

Winning punters are shut down!

It is The Brodsters perogative to point out the injustices that prevail, and it doesn’t just stop at restrictions.

Hopefully one day they will realise the error of their ways and allow law abiding punters to be treated fairly!

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, JJ Flash said:

Do you think your constant attacks on here vis a vis NZTAB have achieved anything tangible.

Brodie is merely pointing out the relationship between weakening turnover and treatment of bigger punters. Do you agree with him?

The TAB is a corporation so I doubt an individual is going to achieve anything tangible. What do you recommend as a course of action?

 

  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

Brodie is merely pointing out the relationship between weakening turnover and treatment of bigger punters. Do you agree with him?

The TAB is a corporation so I doubt an individual is going to achieve anything tangible. What do you recommend as a course of action?

 

I see Tim Vince wrote a bit about the tab on the Darkside, he won just over a grand on course, wasn't allowed to collect had no id on him, personally I would have broken it up into 2 $500 tickets via a machine, but that's neither here nor there, he made a good point that the tab should be questioning large amounts being bet, not small bets that strike it lucky and winning a grand or more ...... where was JJ putting the questions to Tim praising him for his consistency and speaking Latin "vis a vis" ?    .FTM would be proud!

Edited by Flagship uberalles
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

We all know why but more importantly, where are your tips for today JJ!

Come on mate. 

I remember when he mocked me for not picking a winner when he first joined (not realising my consistency in that department) I then said to him if your so good have a go, I think he put up a $1.6 fav that got rolled and that was ftms, i mean jjs first and last!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Flagship uberalles said:

I remember when he mocked me for not picking a winner when he first joined (not realising my consistency in that department) I then said to him if your so good have a go, I think he put up a $1.6 fav that got rolled and that was ftms, i mean jjs first and last!

I am waiting for him to start a topic and give some tips.

I will say no more. (Well, until next time)

  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

I am waiting for him to start a topic and give some tips.

I will say no more. (Well, until next time)

 

2 hours ago, JJ Flash said:

Do you think your constant attacks on here vis a vis NZTAB have achieved anything tangible. Do they even know who Brodie is?? For the record i have no problem with people protesting or striking for  that matter so i do admire your consistency

 

Greg

Be a man FTM and stop hiding behind all these aliases, you have a very distinctive writing style and love all those wanky Latin words they like to use in the corporate world,.."et Al" and "vis a vis"

Screenshot_20190915-101531.png

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Flagship uberalles said:

 

Be a man FTM and stop hiding behind all these aliases, you have a very distinctive writing style and love all those wanky Latin words they like to use in the corporate world,.."et Al" and "vis a vis"

Screenshot_20190915-101531.png

Brilliant pick up Flag.

How many people say 'vis a vis'? One person lol

There are so many similarities it is not funny. One of the simplest match ups is his (their) dislike of Forbury and the fields they have there. 'No self respecting punter would consider Forbury' is the theme. Typical FTM and JJ crossover. 

Another is the attacks on Brodie. Neither FTM or JJ ever actually comment on the issue, they just play the man.

I don't mind if JJ posts here and RC, just don't stir shit on here and then run back to RC and start threads. Mind you, the treatment of Jack Sprat shows it just isn't on here.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

He likes that comparison for some reason. Not so much the one with FTM.

 

3 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

Brilliant pick up Flag.

How many people say 'vis a vis'? One person lol

There are so many similarities it is not funny. One of the simplest match ups is his (their) dislike of Forbury and the fields they have there. 'No self respecting punter would consider Forbury' is the theme. Typical FTM and JJ crossover. 

Another is the attacks on Brodie. Neither FTM or JJ ever actually comment on the issue, they just play the man.

I don't mind if JJ posts here and RC, just don't stir shit on here and then run back to RC and start threads. Mind you, the treatment of Jack Sprat shows it just isn't on here.

 

Yes doesn't pay to question things like jack spratt and stables do over there it is forbidden!! it's so obvious JJ is FTM the way he greases up Scooby and leo exactly what FTM used to do.......I knew there was only one fucker that used vis a vis

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...