-
Available Subscriptions
Trotting Chat
3,023 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 428 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 13 replies
- 715 views
-
- 1 reply
- 374 views
-
- 5 replies
- 533 views
-
- 43 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 491 views
-
- 10 replies
- 807 views
-
- 26 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 279 views
-
- 27 replies
- 2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 671 views
-
- 0 replies
- 411 views
-
- 30 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 24 replies
- 829 views
-
- 11 replies
- 763 views
-
- 22 replies
- 972 views
-
- 9 replies
- 822 views
-
- 45 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 633 views
-
- 44 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 70 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 3 replies
- 485 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
Not at all. Nowhere close. -
Where did @Thomass abuse someone? I don't read a lot of this stuff if I'm not interested in the topic.
-
Not quite sure where Colin would have breached this new rule. He only shares his opinion, not that I always agree with it. Maybe gets some facts wrong. No law against that.
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You seriously think that the Bill Of Rights has any clout? What specifically in the Bill Of Rights expands allowable speech beyond other statutes? Does the BOR allow @Thomass to spout off on social media abusing individuals? You surely must admit the Kevin Morton went very close to the line in expressing his "oponion"! -
Yes but that's what I said. Not really my point though. They can change the rule, but I fail to see how it can make any difference to its effect. The proposed addition has long since been covered by the current rule.
-
-
Topics
-
