JJ Flash

No idea at this stage who will win Cup Surely you jest with the Your Boys bit as i have no association with the stable other than knowing a few of their owners. You know their the ones that are paying the bills to put the show on. Do you have any issues with that? Results say they are the best,they accumulate the best stock so will no doubt be a force as usual come Cup week. Greg

Just for you Chief, albeit that like most things it will never be enough for you. Read this Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (AML/CFT).Its about the length of war and peace but you seem to have plenty of spare time by the looks of it. PS , can you send me your phone or email address, now that you have taken away my PM function i am not able to help you like i did when you had your meltdown about outing all your secret stuff about other channel. Wisely and possibly after my PM advice you pulled that thread as no good was ever going to come from your suggested option IMHO. No law fees either. Please fell free to have the last say on the AML matter. If you cant get it then im not wasting my time on it with you any further Greg

AML not likely to be high on the list of reasons Brodie. A few of the bigger players i know gave up after the Nelson INCA race whilst others got the stitch over continual bad press,associated integrity issues and poor governance at the top table . Sad but true. TB"s clean sheet so to speak has seen them hold their own and attract some new participants. One only has to look at the momentum of BGP and their impact on turnover. Greg

The previous management team agreed to it after consultations with DIA. As i posted earlier its the law despite what some think. Personally i think 10K would be a more reasonable amount but that's not happening at this stage. Greg

I was helping out someone at the time of its removal You clearly are not going to and simply trolling every post i make so dont worry about it . As for your earlier challenge when i was responding to Brodies post , note Brodie not you " 1 August 2019 From 1 August 2019 customers of the TAB who want to bet or collect $1,000 or more at a TAB site or at a race meeting will be required by law to verify themselves using their TAB account or ‘Punters Pass’ - a card the TAB issues to customers who use cash and have had their identity previously verified. The Punters Pass is one of a range of systems and processes the TAB has put in place to comply with legislative changes to the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (AML/CFT). “Over the past twelve months the TAB has been working hard to understand where our risks of money laundering are, in preparation for meeting the requirements of the new legislation,” says TAB General Manager Customer Gary Woodham.

Correct, i am multi coded , i hope your ok with that. You sum yourself up well , thats probably why you and Leo get on so well. Shit hes saying more or less what you are on certain matters of late and vice versa Are you going to give me back my PM function or are you being mean and holding back. Greg

Perception and reality are not good bedfellows where the media are concerned or are you really that naive. Go away and have a cuppa and a lie down Greg

I know its an inconvenient truth but it occurred on their watch I'm sure if you use your excellent research skills you'll find it . I'm busy enjoying the sun and planning an afternoons punting. Greg

Why am i surprised by that question from you, think cause and effect or is that beyond you. Actually , try reading and understanding this , Newspapers both paper and online have been all over INCA and M Anderson cases. Ask yourself has there been any positive press about Harness out of it. Answer,, nothing positive at all for Racing. All that i have heard for a few years now is peoples perception that the game is full of crooks,i.e lacks integrity. As i posted elsewhere i know of 4 punters who wont touch harness now and they previously would be in the 5-10K a week spend.

In case you did not know - its the LAW. Nothing to do with current NZTAB or RITA who i heard sought 10K but were unsuccessful . Blame those who ran the show beforehand i.e Glenda and John for the 1K limit Greg

If that were the case Brodie surely the TB payout would be a lot lower also given the pools they bet into are way larger. But carry on your crusade and dont let facts get in the way of your story. Bad press is not helping Harness at present and as the media focus on sensationalism for click bait expect more of the same for all codes. Hence why Integrity is everything going forward, not giving media any more ammo is thus imperative IMHO Greg

Simply because you and most others on here show complete disdain for the excellence of the AS stable. FFS its NZ's feature Grp 1 race to be run in 4 months time and your predicting a boring race already. Whilst your completely within your rights to voice an opinion so am i and i plainly disagree with you on this matter Greg

Whatever you say Whippyitout Greg

Interesting , do you go back to your old stomping ground very often? Greg

Good on you for admitting that Yes you dont have much on this particular issue, I neither put the boot in nor back tracked anywhere on this issue. I still dont know if it was Matt that was up on charges mentioned. Seeing as how you know everything including my motives for pointing out in a Matt Anderson thread that " A M Anderson appeared in court on Assault and Strangulation charges" whether it was in fact him. If you want to play these silly games carry on but i see it as futile when you are not reading my posts rationally. Greg

Ah , not one of your usual abusive ones but youll be back quickly or cant you read the above Greg

Because i thought it coincidental that a M Anderson, a not unusual name, was in court on Assault charges. To this day i dont know if it was the Harness M Anderson . Further, you jumped to conclusions which i have now advised you were clearly false once i found out why i was moderated in the first place. Can you not admit in this instance you are wrong in your assessment Greg

Whats "At worst then"? Thanks for finally answering my moderation question Greg

See you are just so wrong about that. All,l i did in the Matt Anderson thread which you removed was add that "a M Anderson had appeared in court on Assault and Strangulation charges" I have no idea whether its the same one which is why i stated what i did namely " A M Anderson". never said Matt and never said the named person was gulity or anything else. Seen a lot worse on here so its obvious you are not reading my posts rationally in this instance.

Im not interested in other sites policies , why will you not let me have access to my PM function. You keep saying i know why but i dont , just message me directly with the reason if you dont want others to know .

So you are saying that McKenzies replies were lies Greg

Part of me is , still wont let me get acess to my PM function or tell me why i was moderated. the latter is not that hard is it I agree in this instance that you are 100% I take it you and a few others on here whose opinions differ from mine would like me to do a Hesi, Galah,Westview and a multitude of others and leave. Greg

On my PMs which you are refusing to let me have access to

Yes didnt John and Glenda do a great job,sent it under. Nice work by the RITA board and WP to get Racing Act bill through and a capital injection to cover all the previous losses. You will see it other wise but that's your way with anything RITA, someone within that organisation must have really pissed you off. Would they not do a Q and A for you after CEO did it elsewhere? Greg

I dont and thats why i keep asking . Have you read something on their which is making you follow this course of action? Greg