Maybe, but this sort of stuff just further perpetrates that nonsense. I'm not going to pick it apart. Can't be bothered reading it again but this comment struck me.
Bullet point four also describes ‘sport’ as a stakeholder, which is entirely incorrect. Sport supplies the TAB with a product on which to bet, for which they receive a fair fee and fair commission on the profit derived. Sport is simply a supplier.
Now, I can't say I've ever heard of a business that doesn't consider their suppliers as key stakeholders. As a supplier, if I thought my customers didn't consider me a key stakeholder in their business, I'd be looking for someone else to supply to. NZSport could do that too.
It's like Brian writes this stuff then has a mini-brain explosion every now and then. Can't see how that could make sense to anyone.
From Investopedia:
What Is a Stakeholder?
A stakeholder is a party that has an interest in a company and can either affect or be affected by the business. The primary stakeholders in a typical corporation are its investors, employees, customers, and suppliers.