Freda

I wasn't trying to be clever...you did say that you 'knew the good guys' so, it kinda made sense to me to patronise one of the 'good guys' and then you would know you will be treated fairly, and so will your dog.

A very good harness trainer was reputed to have told a potential client ' if you need to ask the charges, you can't afford them. Go somewhere else ' . Find a 'good guy ' - as you say you know which they are - and pay what they ask .

Why would 'northerners' want to come down specially for an AWT when they have one at Cambridge?

Interesting look-back. Remember, there used to be handicap two year old races at nearly every meeting, country or otherwise, as well as the stakes-rated Welcome, Challenge and Champagne stakes here in Canterbury. Now, there are so few dedicated two year old contests, it is quite difficult to give your youngster a race or two 'for next year' if it isn't able to take in one of the few available, for various reasons. That is a potent disincentive to purchase nicely-bred yearlings specifically for early racing.

We down south have already looked through that window. Have to accept jumping is finished. In all honesty, racing jumping doesn't appeal to Joe Public like it used to. With an increasingly urban-based population, the prospect of horses becoming exhausted, dropping out a good distance from the finish, falling, just doesn't appeal. And V'Landy's has made a huge success of NSW racing without jumping.

The news so far is not good. Very sad. Awful too for Weatherley. There is no way anyone goes out to deliberately maim or hurt another rider. He will be feeling terrible.

We'll see, I guess.

Do you think it might be divided three times to compensate for the lack of jumping races? 🤣 🤣

You know - a thought - Kevin Myers could guarantee numbers for next year [ not being anywhere akin to his nickname ] and the continuation of the Nationals here for a year or two more at least, and end up taking home the thick end of the not inconsiderable stakemoney. Not a bad week's business with no opposition.

Pretty much, yes. However, Cup Week, in ChCh, has so much going for it apart from gallops, it really works, and that is one potent reason for leaving those races in place.

Wait and see, L.

Yes, he' s had a plenty of crap fortune along with the good stuff...unfortunately life isn't fair and no-one is immune from the twists and turns of fate. All the best, Mickey; I can still see you eating an icecream sitting on a rail, swinging your legs, a long time ago now.

If K. Myers has a puncture on the way down there won't be any jumping races....

That is a huge concern to some - yes, it's very useful to have the polytrack as a work option - otherwise the swimming pool or standing in a box is all one could do with the weather we've had. But as for conditioning horses for the expected surface, no. Those with their own transport or plenty of dosh can go to Rangiora, or Ashburton if that's closer - or the beach - but Riccarton based horses are at a big disadvantage otherwise.

I don't know. Given that there are now no [ sorry Meg, one ] jumper in training in the south, most aren't actually concerned with jumping numbers. I don't mean they don't care, but it isn't right in their focus right now, with their own teams to deal with.

BELIEVE IT.

The Nats offered very little resistance to the 'Act' - and they could have - so I doubt whether a change to the logical 'other side ' would achieve much. Hope I'm wrong though.

Great sentiments, Joe, wholeheartedly agree. One of my flatmates is a volunteer to RDA as well - she is on a 'jobseeker' benefit, former drug addict, abused in a former relationship - and we all thought that's where she would stay, with self-esteem at rock bottom. So, with a few verbal arse-kicks from this household as well as a lot of positive feedback, she is now one of their valued workers, and has been given the chance to take a course and become a permanent, paid employee of RDA. So, not just the horses or the kids, there are positive vibes around the whole operation.

No, but you could at Timaru!

Sadly, that seems to be about right. Which is why tempers become a bit stretched and some posters become angry when they/we confront the demise of our once proud industry. We are fortunate that the Chief hosts a site where we can have a vent, I for one appreciate it and pretty sure most others do too, however he is well able to dish out what he receives .! As for S.A....he/she has to accept that there have been many pretenders to the salvation of NZ Racing..so he/she must realise that until evidence is forthcoming, scepticism will remain. Beating the breast and taking pot-shots at passionate stakeholders isn't really the way forward.

Certainly would have...but the hurdles it was supposed to be attempting to jump, and the looming outside fence might have been alarming - especially for those on its outside.

Yes. Sufficient funds - and support in the form of local contractors- to have implemented any 'improvements' to the course that NZTR deemed necessary. But weren't given the chance. Agenda driven all the way.

I was in attendance at an enquiry when the said Mr Oatham told the rider of a hanging horse that he 'should have let the reins go'.

Unbelievable.

More than one or two I should think.