Freda

I'd be there to brush a tail.

WRT the 'senior person' to represent him ; things have obviously changed since I had apprentices...but if I couldn't be at the races, another trainer or suitable other [ retired and reputable jockey, etc ] had to be nominated. In the early days, the apprentice was given a letter to hand to an official, but as said apprentice became more proficient and knew most of those folk at the races, it was sufficient for me to ring a stipe and say ' Pitty is representing......if necessary ' and that was enough.

Neither have I. Only from NZTA. That arrived Sunday, with a request to RSVP by Monday....!! Curious expressed his thoughts far better than I could...no specific 'agenda', aims, or points of discussion, with opinions and/or suggested solutions called for. No research that I could see as a term of reference, with evidence that a particular plan might work. Just a lot of fluffy stuff, with that awful comment ' elite trainers will not have to compete with the lower-cost model ' which has offended people at the track this morning, I can assure you. But most will have the same view. The roadshow will be an expensive waste of time, the dissenting voices will get no traction, I've been going to meetings, both out of interest, and on behalf of others, for forty-odd years. Nothing relevant ever seems to eventuate. I won't be wasting my time either.

Yes, I get muttered at for being critical, at times...and I do agree that it is far easier to take pot-shots than actually 'fix' things. Go to programming meetings, I was told, seeing you know so much. But, where do you start? Tinkering at that level achieves little, the whole thing needs a complete re-vamp, far outside the scope of those meetings. And programming, while a significant matter, isn't the whole deal. As NM says, a daunting task indeed, to fix the wider industry.

Precisely.

Notwithstanding all the other ramifications of these proposed changes, this particular idea merely returns classifications to yesteryear. Public trainers and owner- trainers were the only categories then. I well recall the resistance to the idea of the permit-holder, when it was brought in. Objections from the Trainers ' Assn branch that I was involved with ( Canterbury/Westland ) included worries about undercutting fees, and dropping standards of service. Also, the training of young folk, either potential trainers or apprentice jockeys, was going to be compromised. Subsequently, permit-holders were not allowed to have apprentices, but that has, like many rules/standards, has been slowly eroded and now we find apprentices being indentured to trainers who are away at their main job for the day. I wonder, however, where the likes of say, Lance Noble fits? Essentially now a private trainer for the Lindsays/Cambridge Stud, but certainly a professional of good repute for a long time. And where does Te Akau fit? Multiple owners, yes, but the 'operation' is all-encompassing, so Jamie could, at a stretch, be a 'private ' trainer himself. Typically, little thought put into terminology and ramifications thereof. As J.B says, young trainers over the ditch were steered towards the more provincial tracks, with only A class trainers permitted stabling at the main city tracks. I don't know whether that was a specific policy, or whether the cost of such stabling meant that the provincial/country option is simply more suitable for one starting out. Clearly, with country and provincial tracks in NZ getting squeezed out both by attrition and policy, that option won't be available for new trainers here.

Yeah, they sure would have. Remember C George trying to tell the winningest rider in NZ of all time, how to do his job?

Plenty of ice, Chief.

Was in the bar watching.

Have to take issue with your comment in this case - although I am usually very critical too. I know Matt and Sarah well, the mare is quirky and has her own ideas about what and how she does things. A 'conventional ' ride may, and in fact has, caused the mare to switch off and refuse to compete. She doesn't like to be near other horses, and has ( I believe) been difficult to train and place. Kin Kwo won on her a while ago, storming down the outside away from traffic...but underwhelming in the extreme in subsequent starts. I'm not getting into what the rider should or could have done better, but just thought a wee bit of background might help make sense of what seemed to be a horrid display.

Awesome day at Kurow yesterday.

Just to add a bit of topicality: the 'Omicron' variant has arrived in the community, from an arrival from the UK travelling through Dubai. But wait - the traveller was fully vaccinated and had returned THREE negative tests before flying and while in MIQ. So, WTF is the point of all the expense, anguish, job losses, fear ? that we are being exposed to..?

This lot over here are making it up on the fly, too. I try to take the middle ground in most matters, not just this one; but, how many people are now ill and suffering from pneumonia, etc, from influenza? That seems to have disappeared. Any respiratory affliction is Covid. As the vast majority are not particularly ill, what on earth is the point of all the drama? Yes, there are some who, unfortunately, do become very sick. But, would those same people not also be at risk from the seasonal 'flu? And, also given that most healthy folk can deal with a sniffle, sore throat, headache, and body aches with a few days rest and panadol, it doesn't make sense to wreck society and cost people their livelihoods for that. I realise, too, that if the modelling had been accurate, our health system would have been overwhelmed. So, while I think we can accept that the first lockdown was a fair reaction, esp since we didn't actually ' go hard and early ' but rather pissed around while Bloomfield intoned ' very low risk ' and Simon Bridges was demanding ' close the borders NOW '. But since, it has been knee-jerk, reactionary stuff all the way, while England [ for example ] is just trying to learn to live with the situation.

I'd like to wish everyone who uses this forum, even occasionally, a happy and safe holiday period, in the manner that you personally choose to celebrate. I hope also, that sooner rather than later, we can again enjoy our lovely country with compassion, inclusiveness, and with due respect given to common decency and natural justice.

Agree, Mark Mac was super.

Yeah. My guess is that it was never H 11. Probably a fair bit of surface water, as well as pissing with rain, which would have helped to make the decision to defer. Can only hope that there is enough cushion still.

Pretty sure you're right...I was at Oamaru that day.

Barrie and Nicky Blatch train from the old track - or they did. If they have moved, I'm not aware of it.

I have to assume there will eventually be one every furlong. But, not at the moment, according to riders.

Not quite sure what that meant. My take on things is - we know the Vax is imperfect, therefore vaxed people should still be tested. As they aren't ( in most cases ) they will be responsible for any increase in infection numbers. Not the unvaxed, because they have to be tested.

Outstanding

As far as Riccarton is concerned, the AWT is not due to be raced on until autumn next year. There aren't even marker posts every furlong - or there weren't three weeks ago.

I'll let you know later.

I got a text earlier from NZTR announcing that the races were postponed till Monday. Later on, on the Loveracing.nz page, both Tuesday and Thursday were indicated.

Yep, he has.