-
Available Subscriptions
Galloping Chat
Thoroughbred Racing forum discussion.
4,218 topics in this forum
-
- 20 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 704 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 708 views
-
- 6 replies
- 954 views
-
- 0 replies
- 682 views
-
- 0 replies
- 700 views
-
- 1 reply
- 699 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 872 views
-
- 30 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 467 views
-
- 1 reply
- 730 views
-
- 6 replies
- 943 views
-
- 2 replies
- 791 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1k views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 62 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 5 replies
- 880 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
No 15 in that race was big, went straight past Damsk…. And no 9 was very unlucky, held up by Damsk. -
By Special Agent · Posted
The winner won too well for there to be many excuses for the others -
Bullshit yourself….i said it drew wide, but slotted in one off so dont use that as an excuse, had good run. At least 2 horses from further back ran past it last 100m. As for time, the whole field ran that time, so what?? Once again, you get upset if anyone mentions your prized stable. While we are on it, for the amount of runners they had racing today…. pretty average results for some expensive nags.
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
BULLSHIT. That confirms it you have no idea about racing. Drew wide made a big run at them beaten 2.6 lengths finished 7th drew 15. They ran 1:21 but I guess you know nothing about race times either. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
That's not what you and Freda said at the time. I'm sure they do and congrats to them. Bonus points for having to put up with Wightman.
-
-
Topics
-
