-
Available Subscriptions
The Vent
61 topics in this forum
-
- 25 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 20 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 140 replies
- 15.5k views
-
- 40 replies
- 5.8k views
-
- 50 replies
- 6.5k views
-
- 10 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 40 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 17 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 35 replies
- 4k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 994 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 855 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 161 replies
- 14.6k views
-
- 30 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 86 replies
- 5.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 104 replies
- 9.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 826 views
-
- 0 replies
- 790 views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 30 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 799 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
So what is the difference in margin that you are quibbling over? BTW I'm winning when you aren't and I fund the product you try to make money on. -
Why don’t they offer better odds in NZ when they pay less in taxes here? Same odds in NZ as Oz. You trying to get them to sponsor the site with all this? Probably a good idea. -
https://responsiblewagering.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/H2-report-final-2.pdf -
The Ones making the decisions arent really that business savvy! The tote turnover figures are grossly inflated due to all of this bonus bets and bonus cash otherwise the tote pools are shockingly lower than years ago. Of course there is more punters that bet final fields nowadays but these final field turnover numbers are significantly lower than they could be. The way the Bookies operate is very amateurish with restrictions, non allowance of punters on options and low amounts accepted on early wagering, as well as odds being slashed far too much. They do not want to increase turnover at all despite what they state or they would not be operating the way they do!! -
Well I don't see where they have suggested anything else, certainly not geo-blocking, though I haven't read the report yet.
-
-
Topics
-
